Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 20:2:12.
doi: 10.1186/s41747-018-0048-3. eCollection 2018 Dec.

Radiological findings in ancient Egyptian canopic jars: comparing three standard clinical imaging modalities (x-rays, CT and MRI)

Affiliations

Radiological findings in ancient Egyptian canopic jars: comparing three standard clinical imaging modalities (x-rays, CT and MRI)

Patrick E Eppenberger et al. Eur Radiol Exp. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of our study was to evaluate the potential and the limitations of standard clinical imaging modalities for the examination of ancient Egyptian canopic jars and the mummified visceral organs (putatively) contained within them.

Methods: A series of four ancient Egyptian canopic jars was imaged comparing the three standard clinical imaging modalities: x-rays, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Additionally, imaging-data-based volumetric calculations were performed for quantitative assessment of the jar contents.

Results: The image contrast of the x-ray images was limited by the thickness and high density of the calcite mineral constituting the examined jars. CT scans showed few artefacts and revealed hyperdense structures of organ-specific morphology, surrounded by a hypodense homogeneous material. The image quality of MRI scans was limited by the low amount of water present in the desiccated jar contents. Nevertheless, areas of pronounced signal intensity coincided well with hyperdense structures previously identified on CT scans. CT-based volumetric calculations revealed holding capacities of the jars of 626-1319 cm3 and content volumes of 206-1035 cm3.

Conclusions: CT is the modality of choice for non-invasive examination of ancient Egyptian canopic jars. However, despite its limitations, x-ray imaging will often remain the only practicable method for on-site investigations. Overall, the presented radiological findings are more compatible with contained small organ fragments rather than entire mummified organs, as originally expected, with consequent implications for envisioned future sampling for chemical and genetic analysis.

Keywords: Ancient Egyptian canopic jars; Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Paleoradiology; Radiography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Not applicable.Not applicable.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Ancient Egyptian canopic jars on display in the Egyptian collection of the Archaeological Museum in Zagreb, Croatia (with kind permission of the Archaeological Museum in Zagreb, Croatia)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CT-based density measurements. Placement of regions of interest A and A’ (calcite mineral), B and B′ (surrounding material) and C and C′ (structures of higher radiodensity) for two canopic jars (inventory numbers 610-2 and 607) on sagittal multiplanar reconstructions (slab thickness 1.5 mm)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Three-dimensional surface reconstructions and volume calculations of one canopic jar (inventory number 607) obtained with Rhinoceros 3D. From left to right: volume including jar contents (−350 HU threshold), volume of calcite jar only (900 HU threshold), calculated volume of actual contents and calculated maximal holding capacity
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
CT scans, sagittal cross sections through the centre of the jars (top) and correlative 3D volume renderings (bottom) of all four canopic jars (a, inventory number 607; b, inventory number 617; c, inventory number 622-1; d, inventory number 610-2). In panel a, arrows indicate a distinct hyperdense structure of organ-fragment-like morphology, probably intestine
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
CT reconstructions (top) and correlative maximum intensity projections of MRI scans (bottom) of the three canopic jars with solid contents (a, inventory number 607; b, inventory number 617; c, inventory number 622-1). Black arrows (on CT) and white arrows (on MRI) indicate structures of organ-fragment-like morphology, probably intestine
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Direct comparison of the three imaging modalities: x-rays (a, d), CT (b, e) and MRI (c, f) of the canopic jars with the smallest and the largest diameter (ac, inventory number 617; df, inventory number 622-1)

References

    1. Koenig W, Barth JA. 14 Photographien mit Roentgen-Strahlen: aufgenommen im physikalischen Verein zu Frankfurt a.M. Verlag von Johann Ambrosius Barth, Leipzig. 1896.
    1. Lewin PK, Harwood-Nash DC (1977) Computerized axial tomography in medical archeology. Paleopathol Newsl:17–8–9 - PubMed
    1. Cox SL. A critical look at mummy CT scanning. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2015;298:1099–1110. doi: 10.1002/ar.23149. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saab G, Chhem RK, Bohay R (2008) Paleoradiologic Techniques. Paleoradiology imaging mummies and fossils. Brothwell DR and Chhem RK. Berlin Heidelberg, Springer Verlag: 15–54
    1. Ruhli FJ, Chhem RK, Boni T. Diagnostic paleoradiology of mummified tissue: interpretation and pitfalls. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2004;55:218–227. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources