Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Jan;108(1):31-38.
doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1308-1. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

Polymer-free drug-coated coronary stents in diabetic patients at high bleeding risk: a pre-specified sub-study of the LEADERS FREE trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Polymer-free drug-coated coronary stents in diabetic patients at high bleeding risk: a pre-specified sub-study of the LEADERS FREE trial

Gert Richardt et al. Clin Res Cardiol. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: Diabetics are at increased risk after stent implantation and potentially sensitive to the type of stent and dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT). The randomized, double-blind LEADERS FREE trial compared 2432 patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) receiving either a polymer-free BA9-coated stent (DCS) or a bare metal stent (BMS) with 1 month of DAPT, and showed superior safety and efficacy of the DCS at 2 years. We report outcomes at 2 years of the pre-specified diabetic subgroup.

Methods and results: The diabetic sub-group comprised 805 (33.1%) patients; 262 (10.8%) were insulin-dependent (IDDM). Compared to non-diabetics, diabetics were younger and had more risk factors and multi-vessel disease. They suffered higher rates of death (15.6 vs. 12.2%, p = 0.01), cardiac death (8.3 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.02), myocardial infarction (MI) (11.1 vs. 7.8%, p = 0.009) and definite/probable stent thrombosis (3.1 vs. 1.7%, p = 0.01), but rates of clinically-indicated TLR (9.1 vs. 9.5%, p = 0.93) and BARC 3-5 bleeding (10.2 vs. 8.4%, p = 0.20) were comparable. Compared to diabetic patients treated with a BMS, diabetic DCS recipients required less clinically driven TLR (6.3 vs. 12.2%, p = 0.006). The primary safety endpoint (cardiac death, MI, definite/probable stent thrombosis) occurred numerically less frequently in the DCS group (14.9 vs. 19.7%, p = 0.10), and was significantly lower in IDDM patients (13.8 vs. 25.4%, p = 0.03). BARC 3-5 was similar for patients treated with DCS (9.9%) and BMS (10.5%, p = 0.84).

Conclusions: In diabetic HBR patients, DCS significantly reduced re-intervention rates over BMS, and showed a strong trend towards a safety benefit at 2 years.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01623180.

Keywords: Bleeding; Diabetes mellitus; Drug-coated stents.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Circulation. 2000 Oct 31;102(18):2180-4 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jan 7;43(1):8-14 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 2004 Jun 8;109(22):2727-31 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 24;358(4):342-52 - PubMed
    1. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Nov 1;106(9):1201-7 - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources