Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug;44(8):1249-1257.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5274-x. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

Health-related outcomes of critically ill patients with and without sepsis

Affiliations

Health-related outcomes of critically ill patients with and without sepsis

Kelly Thompson et al. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), survival and healthcare resource use of critically ill adults with and without sepsis.

Methods: We conducted a primary propensity score matched analysis of patients with and without sepsis enrolled in a large multicentre clinical trial. Outcomes included HRQoL at 6 months, survival to 2 years, length of ICU and hospital admission and cost of ICU and hospital treatment to 2 years.

Results: We obtained linked data for 3442 (97.3%) of 3537 eligible patients and matched 806/905 (89.0%) patients with sepsis with 806/2537 (31.7%) without. After matching, there were no significant differences in the proportion of survivors with and without sepsis reporting problems with mobility (37.8% vs. 38.7%, p = 0.86), self-care (24.7% vs. 26.0%, p = 0.44), usual activities (44.5% vs. 46.8%, p = 0.28), pain/discomfort (42.4% vs. 41.6%, p = 0.54) and anxiety/depression (36.9% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.68). There was no significant difference in survival at 2 years: 482/792 (60.9%) vs. 485/799 (60.7%) (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.86-1.18, p = 0.94). The initial ICU and hospital admission were longer for patients with sepsis: 10.1 ± 11.9 vs. 8.0 ± 9.8 days (p < 0.0001) and 22.8 ± 21.2 vs. 19.1 ± 19.0 days, (p = 0.0003) respectively. The cost of ICU admissions was higher for patients with sepsis: A$43,345 ± 46,263 (€35,109 ± 35,043) versus 34,844 ± 38,281 (€28,223 ± 31,007), mean difference $8501 (€6885), 95% CI $4342-12,660 (€3517 ± 10,254), p < 0.001 as was the total cost of hospital treatment to 2 years: A$74,120 ± 60,750 (€60,037 ± 49,207) versus A$65,806 ± 59,856 (€53,302 ± 48,483), p = 0.005.

Conclusions: Critically ill patients with sepsis have higher healthcare resource use and costs but similar survival and HRQoL compared to matched patients without sepsis.

Keywords: Long-term outcomes; Post-intensive care syndrome; Post-sepsis syndrome; Sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):371-9 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 15;367(20):1901-11 - PubMed
    1. Crit Care Med. 2001 Apr;29(4):880-6 - PubMed
    1. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Jun;15(3):425-35 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2010 Oct 27;304(16):1787-94 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources