The Authors Respond: Reframing the Value of Treatments for Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma
- PMID: 29952702
- PMCID: PMC10397929
- DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.7.712
The Authors Respond: Reframing the Value of Treatments for Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Abstract
Funding for the Carlson et al. study was provided in part by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review. Ollendorf, Synnott, Chapman, and Pearson disclosed grants from Blue Shield of California Foundation, California Health Care Foundation, Laura and John Arnold Foundation, Aetna, AHIP, Anthem, Blue Shield of California, CVS Caremark, Express Scripts, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, OmedaRx, United Healthcare, Kaiser Permanente, Premera, AstraZeneca, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, National Pharmaceutical Council, Takeda, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Spark Therapeutics, Sanofi, Prime Therapeutics, and Health Care Service Corporation. Carlson disclosed grants from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review and personal fees from Seattle Genetics, Genentech, and Pfizer. Russo, Guzauskas, Liu, and Brouwer have nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding for the Carlson et al. study was provided in part by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review. Ollendorf, Synnott, Chapman, and Pearson disclosed grants from Blue Shield of California Foundation, California Health Care Foundation, Laura and John Arnold Foundation, Aetna, AHIP, Anthem, Blue Shield of California, CVS Caremark, Express Scripts, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, OmedaRx, United Healthcare, Kaiser Permanente, Premera, AstraZeneca, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, National Pharmaceutical Council, Takeda, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Spark Therapeutics, Sanofi, Prime Therapeutics, and Health Care Service Corporation. Carlson disclosed grants from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review and personal fees from Seattle Genetics, Genentech, and Pfizer. Russo, Guzauskas, Liu, and Brouwer have nothing to disclose.
Comment on
-
Cost-effectiveness of Drugs to Treat Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in the United States.J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jan;24(1):29-38. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.1.29. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018. PMID: 29290170 Free PMC article.
-
Reframing the Value of Treatments for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jul;24(7):711-712. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.7.711. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018. PMID: 29952705 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Carlson JJ, Guzauskas GF, Chapman RH, et al. Cost-effectiveness of drugs to treat relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the United States. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018;24(1):29-38. Available at: https://www.jmcp.org/doi/10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.1.29. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Jakubowiak AJ, Houisse I, Majer I, et al. Cost-effectiveness of carfilzomib plus dexamethasone compared with bortezomib plus dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in the United States. Expert Rev Hematol. 2017;10(12):1107-19. - PubMed
-
- Dimopoulos MA, Kaufman JL, White D, et al. A comparison of the efficacy of immunomodulatory-containing regimens in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a network meta-analysis. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018;18(3):163-73.e166. - PubMed
-
- van Beurden-Tan CHY, Franken MG, Blommestein HM, Uyl-de Groot CA, Sonneveld P.. Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of treatment outcomes in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(12):1312-19. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
