Evaluation of the In Vivo Kinetics and Biostimulatory Effects of Subcutaneously Injected Hyaluronic Acid Filler
- PMID: 29952893
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004496
Evaluation of the In Vivo Kinetics and Biostimulatory Effects of Subcutaneously Injected Hyaluronic Acid Filler
Abstract
Background: Because subcutaneously injected hyaluronic acid filler is absorbed over 6 months to 1 year after the treatment of facial wrinkles, frequent retreatment may be required. However, persistent long-term effects are often clinically observed when hyaluronic acid filler is injected as a bolus for facial augmentation. Therefore, the authors investigated, over time, the changes in volume and histologic features of subcutaneous bolus injections of hyaluronic acid.
Methods: Hyaluronic acid filler was subcutaneously injected as a bolus into the dorsum of 6-week-old rats. At several time points (immediately after injection and 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 weeks thereafter), magnetic resonance imaging was introduced to observe morphologic changes and to measure volume. Histologic examination of sectioned tissues was also performed.
Results: The average volume increased for up to 4 weeks after injection and then gradually decreased, with 74.8 percent of the injected volume remaining after 64 weeks, with no statistical difference compared to the initial volume. Histologic analysis revealed that lattice structures were created by fibroblasts and collagen fibers, and blood vessels and adipocytes were also generated in the filler.
Conclusions: Although subcutaneous bolus injections of hyaluronic acid filler exhibited flattening, the total volume was maintained even after 64 weeks. Histologically, hyaluronic acid filler acted as a scaffold for autogenous tissue replacement by means of fibroblast migration and proliferation, collagen induction, and angiogenesis, followed by proliferation of adipocytes. This study demonstrates that the total volume is maintained long-term by replacing part of the injected hyaluronic acid filler with autologous tissues.
Comment in
-
Discussion: Evaluation of the In Vivo Kinetics and Biostimulatory Effects of Subcutaneously Injected Hyaluronic Acid Filler.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jul;142(1):122-123. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004530. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018. PMID: 29952894 No abstract available.
-
Evaluation of the In Vivo Kinetics and Biostimulatory Effects of Subcutaneously Injected Hyaluronic Acid Filler.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar;143(3):659e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005332. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019. PMID: 30601297 No abstract available.
-
Reply: Evaluation of In Vivo Kinetics and Biostimulatory Effects of Subcutaneously Injected Hyaluronic Acid Filler.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar;143(3):659e-660e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005333. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019. PMID: 30601305 No abstract available.
References
-
- Olenius MThe first clinical study using a new biodegradable implant for the treatment of lips, wrinkles, and folds. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1998;22:97101.
-
- Brandt FS, Cazzaniga AHyaluronic acid gel fillers in the management of facial aging. Clin Interv Aging 2008;3:153159.
-
- Carruthers JD, Glogau RG, Blitzer AFacial Aesthetics Consensus Group Faculty. Advances in facial rejuvenation: Botulinum toxin type a, hyaluronic acid dermal fillers, and combination therapies. Consensus recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(Suppl):5S30S; quiz 31S36S.
-
- Humphrey CD, Arkins JP, Dayan SHSoft tissue fillers in the nose. Aesthet Surg J. 2009;29:477484.
-
- Cattin TAA single injection technique for midface rejuvenation. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2010;9:256259.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
