Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 25:76:129-135.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.05.039. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

Influence of forearm orientation on biceps brachii tendon mechanics and elbow flexor force steadiness

Affiliations

Influence of forearm orientation on biceps brachii tendon mechanics and elbow flexor force steadiness

Rowan R Smart et al. J Biomech. .

Abstract

Achilles tendon mechanics influence plantar flexion force steadiness (FS) and balance. In the upper limb, elbow flexor FS is greater in supinated and neutral forearm orientations compared to pronated, with contributions of tendon mechanics remaining unknown in position-dependent FS. This study investigated whether distal biceps brachii (BB) tendon mechanics across supinated, neutral and pronated forearm orientations influence position-dependent FS of the elbow flexors. Eleven males (23 ± 3 years) performed submaximal isometric elbow flexion tasks at low (5, 10% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)) and high (25, 50, 75% MVC) force levels in supinated, neutral and pronated forearm orientations. Distal BB tendon elongation and CSA were recorded on ultrasound to calculate mechanics of tendon stress, strain and stiffness. Relationships between FS, calculated as coefficient of variation (CV) of force, and tendon mechanics were evaluated with multiple regressions. Supinated and neutral were ∼50% stronger and ∼60% steadier than pronated (p < 0.05). Tendon stress was ∼52% greater in supinated and neutral compared to pronated, tendon strain was ∼36% greater in neutral than pronated (p < 0.05), while tendon stiffness (267.4 ± 78.9 N/mm) did not differ across orientations (p > 0.05). At low forces, CV of force was predicted by MVC (r2: 0.52) in supinated, and MVC and stress in neutral and pronated (r2: 0.65-0.81). At high force levels, CV of force was predicted by MVC and stress in supinated (r2: 0.49), and MVC in neutral (r2: 0.53). Absolute strength and tendon mechanics influence the ability of the BB tendon to distribute forces, and thus are key factors in position-dependent FS.

Keywords: Neuromuscular; Strength; Tendon stress; Ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources