Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 31:2018:5845218.
doi: 10.1155/2018/5845218. eCollection 2018.

Implementation Process and Impacts of a Participatory HIV Research Project with Key Populations

Affiliations

Implementation Process and Impacts of a Participatory HIV Research Project with Key Populations

Sónia Dias et al. Biomed Res Int. .

Abstract

A participatory HIV research project was conducted with sex workers (SW) and men who have sex with men (MSM) to understand epidemiological HIV dynamics and associated sociobehavioural factors among these vulnerable groups. We examine the impact of this project, critically analysing the processes undertaken and focusing on the advantages and the challenges faced. A partnership was built through two Community Advisory Boards (CABs) and a Scientific Commission (SC). Regular meetings, workshops, and focus groups were conducted with CABs, SC, and partners to assess the processes and outcomes of the project implementation. This participatory research produced change processes with impacts at different levels: individuals, community organizations, health professionals, academics, and policy-makers. Advantages of the participatory process were encountered but also challenges, evidencing the dynamic and complex nature of each project's stage. This project showed that participatory research can work as an intervention. Indeed, it triggered a dynamic and interactive process of knowledge coproduction and translation into effective community-oriented health actions and policies. The participatory research reproduced an innovative alliance for HIV prevention and sexual health promotion responsive to local needs and priorities. Further efforts are needed to systematize and evaluate the processes and impacts of participatory health research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mayan M. J., Daum C. Handbook of Qualitative Health Research for Evidence-Based Practice. Vol. 4. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2016. Beyond Dissemination: Generating and Applying Qualitative Evidence Through Community-Based Participatory Research; pp. 441–452. (Handbooks in Health, Work, and Disability). - DOI
    1. Lyn R., Morse M. J. Readme First for a User’s Guide to Qualitative Methods. 2nd. Thousand Oaks Calif, Ca, USA: Sage Publications; 2013.
    1. Frohlich K. L., Potvin L. Transcending the known in public health practice: The inequality paradox: The population approach and vulnerable populations. American Journal of Public Health. 2008;98(2):216–221. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.114777. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. UNAIDS. UNAIDS Guidance Note on HIV and Sex Work. Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS; 2009.
    1. WHO. Guidelines: Prevention and Treatment of HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections among Men Who Have Sex with Men and Transgender People: Recommendations for a Public Health Approach. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2011. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources