Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 13;1(10):e001107.
doi: 10.3945/cdn.117.001107. eCollection 2017 Oct.

Co-construction and Evaluation of a Prevention Program for Improving the Nutritional Quality of Food Purchases at No Additional Cost in a Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Population

Affiliations

Co-construction and Evaluation of a Prevention Program for Improving the Nutritional Quality of Food Purchases at No Additional Cost in a Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Population

Marlène Perignon et al. Curr Dev Nutr. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Food prices influence food choices. Purchasing foods with higher nutritional quality for their price may help improve the diet quality of socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals. Objective: This study aimed to describe the co-construction and evaluation of the Opticourses prevention program, which promotes healthy eating among participants in socioeconomically deprived situations by improving the nutritional quality of their household food purchases with no additional cost. Methods: Individuals were recruited in poor districts of Marseille, France. The intervention and evaluation tools and protocols were co-constructed with 96 individuals. Then, 93 adults willing to participate in a standardized intervention comprising 5 participative workshops on diet and budget were enrolled. Impact on food purchases was estimated with experimental economics: 2-d experimental food purchase intents were observed at baseline and endline for workshop participants (WPs, n = 35) and controls (n = 23), with the use of monetary incentives to limit social-desirability bias. Changes in food and nutrient content and energy cost (expressed in €/2000 kcal) of experimental purchases were assessed. Results: The co-constructed participative workshops included playful activities around food purchase practices and the nutritional quality, taste, and price of foods. Experimental purchases contained a large amount of energy at baseline for both WPs and controls (5114 and 4523 kcal ⋅ d-1 ⋅ person-1, respectively). For WPs only, the mean energy content decreased between baseline and endline (-1729 kcal ⋅ d-1 ⋅ person-1; P < 0.01; medium effect size: Cohen's d = 0.5), and the percentage of energy from free sugars and from foods high in fat, sugar, and salt also decreased (both P < 0.05 and medium effect sizes), whereas energy cost remained unchanged. No significant changes between baseline and endline were observed for the controls. Conclusions: After the intervention, the energy content of participants' experimental purchases was closer to their needs, suggesting that the workshops helped them plan and rationalize their food purchases better. The nutritional quality of the experimental purchases increased but energy cost did not, showing that the co-constructed Opticourses prevention program can favorably change food purchasing behaviors of socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals with no additional cost. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02383875.

Keywords: cost; diet; experimental economics; food prices; food purchasing behavior; intervention; low-income; nutritional quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Principles of the co-construction approach.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Participation rate at each workshop during the intervention stage (n = 93).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Darmon N, Drewnowski A.. Does social class predict diet quality? Am J Clin Nutr 2008;87:1107–17. - PubMed
    1. Drewnowski A, Darmon N.. The economics of obesity: dietary energy density and energy cost. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82(1 Suppl):265S–73S. - PubMed
    1. Maillot M, Darmon N, Darmon M, Lafay L, Drewnowski A.. Nutrient-dense food groups have high energy costs: an econometric approach to nutrient profiling. J Nutr 2007;137:1815–20. - PubMed
    1. Beydoun MA, Wang Y.. How do socio-economic status, perceived economic barriers and nutritional benefits affect quality of dietary intake among US adults? Eur J Clin Nutr 2008;62:303–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Waterlander WE, de Mul A, Schuit AJ, Seidell JC, Steenhuis IH.. Perceptions on the use of pricing strategies to stimulate healthy eating among residents of deprived neighbourhoods: a focus group study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010;7:44. - PMC - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources