Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul-Aug;24(4):220-227.
doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_486_17.

Association of coagulopathy with the risk of bleeding after invasive procedures in liver cirrhosis

Affiliations

Association of coagulopathy with the risk of bleeding after invasive procedures in liver cirrhosis

Jing Li et al. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background/aim: Bleeding risk among patients with acute or chronic liver disease after invasive procedures is a common concern in clinical practice. This retrospective study aimed to explore whether the presence of coagulopathy increased the risk of major bleeding after invasive procedures in cirrhosis.

Patients and methods: A total of 874 cirrhotic patients underwent invasive procedures. Coagulopathy was defined as international normalized ratio (INR) ≥1.5 and/or platelets (PLTs) ≤50 × 109/L. Severe thrombocytopenia was defined as PLTs ≤ 50 × 109/L. Invasive procedures, major bleeding after invasive procedures, and in-hospital deaths were recorded.

Results: In all, 296 patients (33.9%) had coagulopathy. Major bleeding after invasive procedures occurred in 21 patients (2.4%). Major bleeding after invasive procedures was more frequent in patients with coagulopathy than those without coagulopathy (4.1% vs 1.6%, P = 0.023). Major bleeding after invasive procedures was more frequent in patients with severe thrombocytopenia than those without severe thrombocytopenia (4.9% vs 1.6%, P = 0.008). Incidence of major bleeding after invasive procedures was not significantly different between patients with INR ≥ 1.5 and INR < 1.5 (4.5% vs 2.0%, P = 0.065). Patients with INR ≥1.5 had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality than those with INR < 1.5 (6.4% vs 1.3%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Severe thrombocytopenia significantly increased the risk of major bleeding after invasive procedures in cirrhosis. INR ≥ 1.5 significantly increased in-hospital mortality.

Keywords: In-hospital mortality; international normalized ratio; platelets; prothrombin time; thrombocytopenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest

References

    1. Muciño-Bermejo J, Carrillo-Esper R, Uribe M, Méndez-Sánchez N. Coagulation abnormalities in the cirrhotic patient. Ann Hepatol. 2013;12:713–24. - PubMed
    1. Northup PG, Caldwell SH. Coagulation in liver disease: A guide for the clinician. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:1064–74. - PubMed
    1. Tripodi A, Primignani M, Mannucci PM. Abnormalities of hemostasis and bleeding in chronic liver disease: The paradigm is challenged. Intern Emerg Med. 2010;5:7–12. - PubMed
    1. De Franchis R. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015;63:743–52. - PubMed
    1. Tripodi A. The coagulopathy of chronic liver disease: Is there a causal relationship withbleeding? No. Eur J Intern Med. 2010;21:65–9. - PubMed

MeSH terms