Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 28;8(6):e021161.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021161.

Continuity of care with doctors-a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality

Affiliations

Continuity of care with doctors-a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality

Denis J Pereira Gray et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Continuity of care is a long-standing feature of healthcare, especially of general practice. It is associated with increased patient satisfaction, increased take-up of health promotion, greater adherence to medical advice and decreased use of hospital services. This review aims to examine whether there is a relationship between the receipt of continuity of doctor care and mortality.

Design: Systematic review without meta-analysis.

Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase and the Web of Science, from 1996 to 2017.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Peer-reviewed primary research articles, published in English which reported measured continuity of care received by patients from any kind of doctor, in any setting, in any country, related to measured mortality of those patients.

Results: Of the 726 articles identified in searches, 22 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The studies were all cohort or cross-sectional and most adjusted for multiple potential confounding factors. These studies came from nine countries with very different cultures and health systems. We found such heterogeneity of continuity and mortality measurement methods and time frames that it was not possible to combine the results of studies. However, 18 (81.8%) high-quality studies reported statistically significant reductions in mortality, with increased continuity of care. 16 of these were with all-cause mortality. Three others showed no association and one demonstrated mixed results. These significant protective effects occurred with both generalist and specialist doctors.

Conclusions: This first systematic review reveals that increased continuity of care by doctors is associated with lower mortality rates. Although all the evidence is observational, patients across cultural boundaries appear to benefit from continuity of care with both generalist and specialist doctors. Many of these articles called for continuity to be given a higher priority in healthcare planning. Despite substantial, successive, technical advances in medicine, interpersonal factors remain important.

Prospero registration number: CRD42016042091.

Keywords: continuity of care; doctor patient relationship; doctors; mortality; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection flow diagram.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Duffy S, Lee TH. In-person health care as option B. N Engl J Med 2018;378:104–6. 10.1056/NEJMp1710735 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pereira Gray D, Evans P, Sweeney K, et al. . Towards a theory of continuity of care. J R Soc Med 2003;96:160–6. 10.1177/014107680309600402 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adler R, Vasiliadis A, Bickell N. The relationship between continuity and patient satisfaction: a systematic review. Fam Pract 2010;27:171–8. 10.1093/fampra/cmp099 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wasson JH, Sauvigne AE, Mogielnicki RP, et al. . Continuity of outpatient medical care in elderly men. A randomized trial. JAMA 1984;252:2413–7. - PubMed
    1. Flint C, Poulengeris P, Grant A. The ’Know Your Midwife' scheme–a randomised trial of continuity of care by a team of midwives. Midwifery 1989;5:11–16. 10.1016/S0266-6138(89)80059-2 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources