Comparative Study of the Efficacy of 4% Articaine vs 2% Lidocaine in Surgical Removal of Bilaterally Impacted Mandibular Third Molars
- PMID: 29959306
Comparative Study of the Efficacy of 4% Articaine vs 2% Lidocaine in Surgical Removal of Bilaterally Impacted Mandibular Third Molars
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:200,000) vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:200,000) during surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars.
Materials and methods: The present study was undertaken in 20 patients belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I, of the age group between 18 and 30 years with bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars. Each patient underwent similar surgical procedure. In the first appointment, the patient was randomly selected to receive either 4% articaine or 2% lidocaine (both with epinephrine 1:200,000). Intraoperative and postoperative evaluation was done for both the anesthetic solutions. Following parameters were evaluated: total volume of anesthetic solution used during the surgery, onset of action of the anesthetic agent, duration of anesthesia, duration of postoperative analgesia, incidence, type and severity of adverse reactions, any need to reanesthetize the surgical zone and quality of anesthesia provided by the local anesthetic. Subjective pain evaluation was done with the aid of 100 mm length visual analog scale (VAS) both intraoperatively and postoperatively.
Results: In the present study, 4% articaine was found to have a significantly shorter onset of action than 2% lidocaine. Duration of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 was found to be significantly (1.44 and 1.28 times respectively) longer than 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:200,000. But no significant difference was found in other parameters.
Conclusion: 4% articaine in comparison with 2% lidocaine (both with epinephrine 1:200,000) provided a shorter onset of action and longer duration of anesthesia.
Clinical significance: No significant difference was recorded in the anesthetic efficacy between the two solutions.
Keywords: Articaine; Impacted mandibular third molar; Inferior alveolar nerve block; Lidocaine Mandibular nerve block..
Similar articles
-
Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block during surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007 Mar 1;12(2):E139-44. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007. PMID: 17322803 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and Safety of 2% and 4% Articaine for Lower Third Molar Surgery.J Dent Res. 2015 Sep;94(9 Suppl):166S-73S. doi: 10.1177/0022034515596313. Epub 2015 Jul 22. J Dent Res. 2015. PMID: 26202994 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Articaine and Lidocaine for Buccal Infiltration After Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block For Intraoperative Pain Control During Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery.Anesth Prog. 2017 Summer;64(2):80-84. doi: 10.2344/anpr-64-02-06. Anesth Prog. 2017. PMID: 28604089 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Anesthetic Efficiency of Articaine Versus Lidocaine in the Extraction of Lower Third Molars: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan;77(1):18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Sep 5. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019. PMID: 30267700
-
Articaine buccal infiltration vs lidocaine inferior dental block - a review of the literature.Br Dent J. 2016 Feb 12;220(3):117-20. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.93. Br Dent J. 2016. PMID: 26868800 Review.
Cited by
-
A Split-Mouth Clinical Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lignocaine for Maxillary Bicuspids Extraction.Cureus. 2023 Jun 9;15(6):e40167. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40167. eCollection 2023 Jun. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37431340 Free PMC article.
-
Revolutionising Third Molar Surgery: Unveiling the Superiority of Articaine and Lignocaine in Nerve Block Techniques. A Ground-breaking Triple-Blind, Randomised Clinical Trial.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2025 Feb;24(1):286-292. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-02107-y. Epub 2024 Jan 31. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2025. PMID: 39902435
-
The Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine With 1:100,000 Adrenaline and 0.75% Ropivacaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in the Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar.Cureus. 2022 Sep 27;14(9):e29639. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29639. eCollection 2022 Sep. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36321015 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Efficacy of Lidocaine and Articaine as Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blocking Agents in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: Randomized Controlled Trial.Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Oct 16;59(10):1840. doi: 10.3390/medicina59101840. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. PMID: 37893558 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of lidocaine with articaine buccal injection in reducing complications following impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial.J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Aug;20(4):213-221. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.4.213. Epub 2020 Aug 27. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020. PMID: 32934987 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical