Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 29;8(1):9891.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28060-2.

Prognostic value of clinical and radiological findings for conservative treatment of idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome

Affiliations

Prognostic value of clinical and radiological findings for conservative treatment of idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome

Young Hak Roh et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) is a common source of ulnar-sided wrist pain, yet not all cases of radiographic ulnar impaction are symptomatic. We retrospectively analyze clinical or radiologic factors that affect prognoses of conservative treatment for idiopathic UIS. A total of 114 patients who had been diagnosed with UIS were treated with 6 weeks of short arm orthosis followed by formal physiotherapy for 6 weeks, with lifestyle modification to limit aggravating movements. The response to treatment, including pain numeric rating scale on an ulnar provocation test, grip strength, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (DASH), was assessed at 24-week follow-up. For the 24-week follow-up, 29 patients (25%) underwent ulnar shortening osteotomy due to persistent symptoms after conservative treatment, and 18 (16%) patients had pain scores of greater than 5, but they had not undergone surgery. After controlling for confounding variables, female gender (odds ratio (OR) 1.39), duration of symptom (OR 1.27), high pain NRS score on provocation test (OR 1.45), and enhanced carpal or distal ulna bone on MRI (OR 1.82) were associated with a higher likelihood of treatment failure. Knowledge of the factors offers physicians insight into predicting prognoses and helps patients set realistic expectations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study protocols.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The mean pain NRS (A) and DASH (B) scores exhibited significant clinical improvement at the 24 week follow-up. NRS = numeric rating score, DASH = Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparisons of clinical outcomes in patients with and without bone enhancement on MRI; (A) treatment failure, (B) pain NRS, and (C) DASH score, NRS = numeric rating score, DASH = Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sachar K. Ulnar-sided wrist pain: evaluation and treatment of triangular fibrocartilage complex tears, ulnocarpal impaction syndrome, and lunotriquetral ligament tears. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:1669–1679. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.08.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tomaino MM, Elfar J. Ulnar impaction syndrome. Hand Clin. 2005;21:567–575. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2005.08.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baek GH, et al. Ulnar shortening osteotomy in idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2649–2654. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02983. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Katz DI, Seiler JG, 3rd, Bond TC. The treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome: a systematic review of the literature. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2010;19:218–222. - PubMed
    1. Stockton DJ, Pelletier ME, Pike JM. Operative treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015;40:470–476. doi: 10.1177/1753193414541749. - DOI - PubMed