Psychometric evaluation of an interview-administered version of the Kessler 10-item questionnaire (K10) for measuring psychological distress in rural Bangladesh
- PMID: 29961041
- PMCID: PMC6042570
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022967
Psychometric evaluation of an interview-administered version of the Kessler 10-item questionnaire (K10) for measuring psychological distress in rural Bangladesh
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to translate, adapt and validate the Kessler 10-item questionnaire (K10) for measuring psychological distress in rural Bangladesh.
Design: Cohort study.
Setting: Narail district, Bangladesh.
Participants: A random sample of 2425 adults of age 18-90 years was recruited.
Outcome measure: Validation of the K10 was the major outcome. Sociodemographic factors were measured to assess if the K10 needed adjustment for factors such as age or gender. The Rasch measurement model was used for the validation, and RUMM 2030 and SPSS V.24 software were used for analyses.
Results: Initial inspection of the total sample showed poor overall fit. A sample size of 300, which is more satiated for Rasch analysis, also showed poor overall fit, as indicated by a significant item-trait interaction (χ2= 262.27, df=40, p<0.001) and item fit residual values (mean=-0.25, SD=2.49). Of 10 items, five items were disordered thresholds, and seven items showed misfit, suggesting problems with the response format and items. After removing three items ('feel tired', 'depressed' and 'worthless') and changing the Likert scale categories from five to four categories, the remaining seven items showed ordered threshold. A revised seven-item scale has shown adequate internal consistency, with no evidence of multidimensionality, no differential item functioning on age and gender, and no signs of local dependency.
Conclusions: Analysis of the psychometric validity of K10 using the Rasch model showed that 10 items are not appropriate for measuring psychological distress in rural Bangladesh. A modified version of seven items (K7) with four response categories would provide a psychometrically more robust scale than the original K10. The study findings suggest repeating the K7 version in other remote areas for further validation can substantiate an efficient screening tool for measuring psychological distress among the general Bangladeshi population.
Keywords: item response theory; kessler psychological distress scale; phychological distress; rasch analysis; rural Bangladesh; validation.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Psychometric evaluation of the modified Kessler seven-item version (K7) for measuring psychological distress using Rasch analysis: a cross-sectional study in a rural district of Bangladesh.BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 20;10(2):e034523. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034523. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32086357 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric evaluation of the modified 19-item Bengali version of WHOQOL scale using Rasch analysis: a cross-sectional study of a rural district in Bangladesh.BMC Psychol. 2020 May 1;8(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00411-7. BMC Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32357921 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric evaluation of an interview-administered version of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire for use in a cross-sectional study of a rural district in Bangladesh: an application of Rasch analysis.BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 5;19(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4026-0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019. PMID: 30953506 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing Sleep-Related Safety Behaviors: Adaptation and Validation of a French Version of the Sleep-Related Behaviors Questionnaire in a Nonclinical Sample.Behav Sleep Med. 2020 Jan-Feb;18(1):107-119. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2018.1546178. Epub 2018 Nov 21. Behav Sleep Med. 2020. PMID: 30462561 Review.
-
Preliminary validation of a questionnaire assessing psychological distress in caregivers of patients with malignant mesothelioma: Mesothelioma Psychological Distress Tool-Caregivers.Psychooncology. 2022 Jan;31(1):122-129. doi: 10.1002/pon.5789. Epub 2021 Aug 18. Psychooncology. 2022. PMID: 34406682
Cited by
-
Construct validity and factor structure of the K-10 among Ugandan adults.J Affect Disord. 2022 Aug 15;311:143-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.05.022. Epub 2022 May 11. J Affect Disord. 2022. PMID: 35561886 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of online education on fear of academic delay and psychological distress among university students following one year of COVID-19 outbreak in Bangladesh.Heliyon. 2021 Jun 26;7(6):e07388. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07388. eCollection 2021 Jun. Heliyon. 2021. PMID: 34258456 Free PMC article.
-
Tobacco Smoking and Use of Smokeless Tobacco and Their Association with Psychological Distress and Other Factors in a Rural District in Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study.J Environ Public Health. 2019 Dec 6;2019:1424592. doi: 10.1155/2019/1424592. eCollection 2019. J Environ Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31885635 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric evaluation of the modified Kessler seven-item version (K7) for measuring psychological distress using Rasch analysis: a cross-sectional study in a rural district of Bangladesh.BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 20;10(2):e034523. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034523. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32086357 Free PMC article.
-
Gender difference in domain-specific quality of life measured by modified WHOQoL-BREF questionnaire and their associated factors among older adults in a rural district in Bangladesh.PLoS One. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):e0317113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317113. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 39775741 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sunderland M, Mahoney A, Andrews G. Investigating the factor structure of the kessler psychological distress scale in community and clinical samples of the Australian Population. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 2012;34:253–9. 10.1007/s10862-012-9276-7 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous