Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep;128(3):442-451.
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.06.013. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

Radiotherapy dose-volume parameters predict videofluoroscopy-detected dysphagia per DIGEST after IMRT for oropharyngeal cancer: Results of a prospective registry

Affiliations

Radiotherapy dose-volume parameters predict videofluoroscopy-detected dysphagia per DIGEST after IMRT for oropharyngeal cancer: Results of a prospective registry

Mona Kamal et al. Radiother Oncol. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: Our primary aim was to prospectively validate retrospective dose-response models of chronic radiation-associated dysphagia (RAD) after intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). The secondary aim was to validate a grade ≥2 cut-point of the published videofluoroscopic dysphagia severity (Dynamic Imaging Grade for Swallowing Toxicity, DIGEST) as radiation dose-dependent.

Material and methods: Ninety-seven patients enrolled on an IRB-approved prospective registry protocol with stage I-IV OPC underwent pre- and 3-6 month post-RT videofluoroscopy. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) for swallowing regions of interest (ROI) were calculated. Dysphagia severity was graded per DIGEST criteria (dichotomized with grade ≥2 as moderate/severe RAD). Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) and Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC) were used to identify dose-volume effects associated with moderate/severe RAD.

Results: 31% developed moderate/severe RAD (i.e. DIGEST grade ≥2) at 3-6 months after RT. RPA found DVH-derived dosimetric parameters of geniohyoid/mylohyoid (GHM), superior pharyngeal constrictor (SPC), and supraglottic region were associated with DIGEST grade ≥2 RAD. V61 ≥ 18.57% of GHM demonstrated optimal model performance for prediction of DIGEST grade ≥2.

Conclusion: The findings from this prospective longitudinal registry validate prior observations that dose to submental musculature predicts for increased burden of dysphagia after oropharyngeal IMRT. Findings also support dichotomization of DIGEST grade ≥2 as a dose-dependent split for use as an endpoint in trials or predictive dose-response analysis of videofluoroscopy results.

Keywords: DIGEST; Dose–volume; Dysphagia; Intensity-modulated radiation therapy; Oropharyngeal cancer; Radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Distribution of videofluoroscopic dysphagia grade pre and post-RT (per DIGEST) (n=97). Abbreviations: DIGEST; Dynamic Imaging Grade for Swallowing Toxicity, RT; Radiotherapy.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean dose for all ROIs by dysphagia status (per DIGEST grade) 3–6 months post-RT (n=97). ★Statistically Significant after Bonferroni correction. Abbreviations: ROIs; region of interests, (S/M/IPC); Superior/ middle/inferior pharyngeal constrictors, ITM; intrinsic tongue muscle, Ant; anterior.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Dose volume histograms stratified by dysphagia classification (per DIGEST) 3–6 months after RT (n=97). Abbreviations: ROIs; region of interests, ADM; anterior digastrics muscle, CPM; cricopharyngeal muscle, GGM genioglossus muscle, GHM geniohyoid muscle, (S/M/IPC); Superior/ middle/inferior pharyngeal constrictors, MHM; mylohyoid, ITM; intrinsic tongue muscle. Heatmap of statistical significance for utilized analyses, is displayed below each ROI DVH to quantify the magnitude of p-values for each 1-Gy bin, allowing visual representation of Bonferroni correction. Solid blue squares denote lack of statistical significance, while solid red squares indicate statistical significance under strict multiple-comparison correction.

References

    1. Garden AS, Dong L, Morrison WH, Stugis EM, Glisson BS, Frank SJ, et al. Patterns of disease recurrence following treatment of oropharyngeal cancer with intensity modulated radiation therapy.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013;85:941–7. - PubMed
    1. Eisbruch A, Harris J, Garden AS, Chao CKS, Straube W, Harari PM, et al. Multi-institutional trial of accelerated hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy for early stage oropharyngeal Cancer (RTOG 00–22). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76:1333–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Daly ME, Le Q-T, Maxim PG, Loo BW, Kaplan MJ, Fischbein NJ, et al. Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy in the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer: clinical outcomes and patterns of failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76:1339–46. - PubMed
    1. Parsons JT, Mendenhall WM, Stringer SP, Amdur RJ, Hinerman RW, Villaret DB, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Cancer 2002;94:2967–80. - PubMed
    1. Bhayani MK, Hutcheson KA, Barringer DA, Lisec A, Alvarez CP, Roberts DB, et al. Gastrostomy tube placement in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy: factors affecting placement and dependence. Head Neck 2013;35:1634–40. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms