Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;21(6):1095-1103.
doi: 10.1111/hex.12806. Epub 2018 Jul 2.

Barriers and facilitators to implementing a process to enable parent escalation of care for the deteriorating child in hospital

Fenella J Gill  1   2 , Gavin D Leslie  1 , Andrea P Marshall  3   4   5   6   7
Affiliations

Barriers and facilitators to implementing a process to enable parent escalation of care for the deteriorating child in hospital

Fenella J Gill et al. Health Expect. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To identify barriers and facilitators to implementing a parent escalation of care process: Calling for Help (C4H).

Design: Audits, semi-structured interviews and focus groups guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Setting: Australian paediatric hospital where a parent escalation of care process was introduced in the previous 6 months.

Participants: Four children, 13 parents, 91 nurses and doctors including Medical Emergency Team (MET) members.

Main outcome measures: Parent awareness and involvement in escalating care and factors impacting implementation of C4H.

Results: Two audits identified low level of parent awareness (16/88, 19% and 5/85, 6%). Parent involvement in escalation of care was documented in 11/62 (18%) events. The main facilitators included uniformly positive views that C4H was in the child's best interest, acknowledgement that parents had skills to recognize deterioration and would take action. C4H was considered to add to patient safety and being reviewed by the MET was a patient benefit. Key barriers were the low level of awareness, doubt about parent capabilities, concern about parents' information overload, anticipated overuse of resources, staff unease about possible repercussions and anticipated difficulty for parents to question staff with potential negative effects on parent-staff relationships. Overall C4H presents a challenge to traditional hospital hierarchy and culture.

Conclusions: Although there was a low level of awareness about C4H in practice, there was in-principle support for the concept. Initial strategies had primarily targeted policy change without taking into account the need for practice and organizational behaviour changes. Using a theoretical approach to identify key factors will enable a targeted approach to implementation.

Keywords: clinical deterioration; family escalation of care; implementation; paediatric; parent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Calling for Help 5 steps
Figure 2
Figure 2
Data collection methods
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Shields L, Huaqiong Z, Pratt J, Taylor M, Hunter J, Pascoe E. Family‐centred care for hospitalised children aged 0‐12 yrs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(10):CD004811. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonafide CP, Roland D, Brady PW. Rapid response systems 20 years later: new approaches, old challenges. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170:729‐730. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albutt AK, O'Hara JK, Conner MT, Fletcher SJ, Lawton RJ. Is there a role for patients and their relatives in escalating clinical deterioration in hospital? A systematic review. Health Expect. 2016;20:818‐825. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gill F, Leslie G, Marshall A. The impact of implementation of family initiated escalation of care for the deteriorating patient in hospital: a systematic review. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2016;13:303‐313. - PubMed
    1. Vorwerk J, King L. Consumer participation in early detection of the deteriorating patient and call activation to rapid response systems: a literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25:38‐52. - PubMed

Publication types