Condylar Fractures: Review of 40 Cases
- PMID: 29963420
- PMCID: PMC6018287
- DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_133_17
Condylar Fractures: Review of 40 Cases
Abstract
Purpose: To put an algorithmic approach for the treatment of condylar fractures according to the condition of occlusion.
Patients and methods: This study had been carried out between May 2016 and April 2017. Forty patients were included (6 females and 34 males) with their ages ranged between 3 and 60 years. Patients were managed through two approaches as follows: maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) only regimen and MMF with open reduction and internal fixation regimen. The operated cases were 12 with bilateral condylar/subcondylar fractures, and the rest were unilateral 28 cases.
Results: Data were assessed demographically, time lapse before the intervention, surgically, functionally, and radiologically. In general, there were no significant differences between closed and open methods.
Conclusion: Retromandibular approach was convenient for internal fixation of condylar fracture with a good outcome. In our work, there were no significant differences between closed and open methods in the treatment of condylar fractures.
Keywords: Closed method; condylar fracture; open method; trauma.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures









References
-
- Sharif MO, Fedorowicz Z, Drews P, Nasser M, Dorri M, Newton T, et al. Interventions for the treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;4:CD006538. - PubMed
-
- Chrcanovic BR, Abreu MH, Freire-Maia B, Souza LN. 1,454 mandibular fractures: A 3-year study in a hospital in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40:116–23. - PubMed
-
- Villarreal PM, Monje F, Junquera LM, Mateo J, Morillo AJ, González C, et al. Mandibular condyle fractures: Determinants of treatment and outcome. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:155–63. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous