Priority-setting in health research in Iran: a qualitative study on barriers and facilitators
- PMID: 29966530
- PMCID: PMC6027571
- DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0313-1
Priority-setting in health research in Iran: a qualitative study on barriers and facilitators
Abstract
Background: Priority-setting is a complicated and time-consuming process; however, if appropriately conducted, it could efficiently divert resources to the most important studies. A considerable body of evidence indicates that priority-setting measures in health research taken so far in Iran have not satisfied decision-makers, policy-makers, funders, communities, or even researchers. This study was designed to explore the flaws of these measures and their deciding factors.
Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 23 key participants and used a thematic data-analysis approach to analyse verbatim transcripts and documents. Our interviewees, who were skilful at conducting health research and worked as managers at different levels of the health system, were selected using a purposeful sampling. We asked about their experiences of priority-setting in health and relevant challenges and asked for recommendations. These semi-structured interviews were taped, transcribed and analysed in terms of content and themes using the MAXQDA10 qualitative data-analysis software.
Results: With regard to priority-setting facilitators and barriers, four themes were extracted, namely managerial factors, structural factors, motivational factors, and process factors. Managers' commitment, consideration of intellectual property, compliance with superordinate rules, and provision of a definition of reliable criteria were among the facilitators. The rapid turnover of managers, inefficiency of criteria for faculty promotion, and disregard of appeal mechanisms were examples of the barriers.
Conclusion: It is important to consider appropriate regulations and motivations to provide research priorities and divert scarce resources to them. In addition, it is necessary to improve the knowledge and skills of researchers and research administration offices on priority-setting methods, thereby enhancing priority-oriented research projects.
Keywords: Health research; Iran; management; priority-setting.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Similar articles
-
What the policy and stewardship landscape of a national health research system looks like in a developing country like Iran: a qualitative study.Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Oct 28;20(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00905-3. Health Res Policy Syst. 2022. PMID: 36307850 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying research priorities for health care priority setting: a collaborative effort between managers and researchers.BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Sep 15;9:165. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-165. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009. PMID: 19754969 Free PMC article.
-
Factors affecting engagement between academic faculty and decision-makers: learnings and priorities for a school of public health.Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 25;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0342-9. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018. PMID: 30045730 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges in institutionalizing evidence-informed priority setting for health service packages: a qualitative document and interview analysis from Iran.Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 19;22(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01207-6. Health Res Policy Syst. 2024. PMID: 39160569 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review of priority setting studies in health research in the Islamic Republic of Iran.East Mediterr Health J. 2018 Oct 10;24(8):753-769. doi: 10.26719/2018.24.8.753. East Mediterr Health J. 2018. PMID: 30328606
Cited by
-
What the policy and stewardship landscape of a national health research system looks like in a developing country like Iran: a qualitative study.Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Oct 28;20(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00905-3. Health Res Policy Syst. 2022. PMID: 36307850 Free PMC article.
-
A Tool to Reduce the Problems of Iranian Health Researchers.Iran J Public Health. 2020 Dec;49(12):2441-2442. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v49i12.4840. Iran J Public Health. 2020. PMID: 34178758 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Evolution of Iran's health research system over the past 50 years: a narrative review.J Glob Health. 2018 Dec;8(2):020703. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.020703. J Glob Health. 2018. PMID: 30410740 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Policy options for strengthening evidence-informed health policy-making in Iran: overall SASHA project findings.Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jan 15;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00803-0. Health Res Policy Syst. 2022. PMID: 35033096 Free PMC article.
-
Enablers and barriers for policymaker engagement in health research from the perspective of policymakers: a scoping review.BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 21;15(8):e099720. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099720. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40840994 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization . The World Health Report 2013. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
-
- Mills BF, Karanja DD. Processes and methods for research programme priority setting: the experience of the Kenya Agricultural Research Institute Wheat Programme. Food Policy. 1997;22(1):63–79. doi: 10.1016/S0306-9192(96)00031-0. - DOI
-
- Currat LJ. Complementary approaches for priority setting in health research: review and perspectives. In: Global Forum for Health Research. 10/90 Report on Health Research. Geneva: Global Forum for Health Research; 2000. p. 17–42.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources