Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Aug 19;373(1753):20170245.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0245.

The impact of the built environment on health behaviours and disease transmission in social systems

Affiliations
Review

The impact of the built environment on health behaviours and disease transmission in social systems

Noa Pinter-Wollman et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

The environment plays an important role in disease dynamics and in determining the health of individuals. Specifically, the built environment has a large impact on the prevention and containment of both chronic and infectious disease in humans and in non-human animals. The effects of the built environment on health can be direct, for example, by influencing environmental quality, or indirect by influencing behaviours that impact disease transmission and health. Furthermore, these impacts can happen at many scales, from the individual to the society, and from the design of the plates we eat from to the design of cities. In this paper, we review the ways that the built environment affects both the prevention and the containment of chronic and infectious disease. We bring examples from both human and animal societies and attempt to identify parallels and gaps between the study of humans and animals that can be capitalized on to advance the scope and perspective of research in each respective field. By consolidating this literature, we hope to highlight the importance of built structures in determining the complex dynamics of disease and in impacting the health behaviours of both humans and animals.This article is part of the theme issue 'Interdisciplinary approaches for uncovering the impacts of architecture on collective behaviour'.

Keywords: architecture; chronic disease; containment; infectious disease; prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schrank S, Ekici D. 2016. Healing spaces, modern architecture, and the body. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
    1. Borasi G, Zardini M. 2012. Imperfect health: the medicalization of architecture. Montreal, Canada: Canadian Centre for Architecture.
    1. Sloane DC. 2006. From congestion to sprawl—planning and health in historical context. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 72, 10–18. (10.1080/01944360608976720) - DOI
    1. Frumkin H, Frank LD, Jackson R. 2004. Urban sprawl and public health: designing, planning, and building for healthy communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
    1. Hamlin C, Sheard S. 1998. Revolutions in public health: 1848, and 1998? Br. Med. J. 317, 587–591. (10.1136/bmj.317.7158.587) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types