Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Sep;15(3):327-335.
doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9865-6. Epub 2018 Jul 2.

Ethical Issues of Using CRISPR Technologies for Research on Military Enhancement

Affiliations
Review

Ethical Issues of Using CRISPR Technologies for Research on Military Enhancement

Marsha Greene et al. J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of the key ethical questions of performing gene editing research on military service members. The recent technological advance in gene editing capabilities provided by CRISPR/Cas9 and their path towards first-in-human trials has reinvigorated the debate on human enhancement for non-medical purposes. Human performance optimization has long been a priority of military research in order to close the gap between the advancement of warfare and the limitations of human actors. In spite of this focus on temporary performance improvement, biomedical enhancement is an extension of these endeavours and the ethical issues of such research should be considered. In this paper, we explore possible applications of CRISPR to military human gene editing research and how it could be specifically applied towards protection of service members against biological or chemical weapons. We analyse three normative areas including risk-benefit analysis, informed consent, and inequality of access as it relates to CRISPR applications for military research to help inform and provide considerations for military institutional review boards and policymakers.

Keywords: CRISPR/Cas 9; Enhancement; Ethics of research involving humans; Informed consent; Military; Risk–benefit analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nature. 2017 Aug 24;548(7668):413-419 - PubMed
    1. Am J Bioeth. 2008 Feb;8(2):47-9; discussion W4-6 - PubMed
    1. Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Nov 9;35(11):1021-1023 - PubMed
    1. Nat Biotechnol. 2016 Jan;34(1):78-83 - PubMed
    1. Disabil Soc. 1998 Nov;13(5):665-81 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources