Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Feb 25;58(9):2570-2579.
doi: 10.1002/anie.201806853. Epub 2018 Dec 11.

Multimodality Imaging Agents with PET as the Fundamental Pillar

Affiliations
Review

Multimodality Imaging Agents with PET as the Fundamental Pillar

Dalong Ni et al. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. .

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) provides quantitative information in vivo with ultra-high sensitivity but is limited by its relatively low spatial resolution. Therefore, PET has been combined with other imaging modalities, and commercial systems such as PET/computed tomography (CT) and PET/magnetic resonance (MR) have become available. Inspired by the emerging field of nanomedicine, many PET-based multimodality nanoparticle imaging agents have been developed in recent years. This Minireview highlights recent progress in the design of PET-based multimodality imaging nanoprobes with an aim to overview the major advances and key challenges in this field and substantially improve our knowledge of this fertile research area.

Keywords: PET; dual-modality imaging; imaging agents; multimodality imaging; nanomedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Features of the main imaging modalities described in this Minireview.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
a) Schematic illustration of chelator-based radiolabeling of IONPs with 89Zr using DFO as a chelator. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [22]. Copyright 2014, Nature Publishing Group. b) Schematic illustration of the chelator-free synthesis of *As (or 69Ge)-SPIONs. TEM images of SPIONs c) before and d) after transferring them into hydrophilic solutions. e) In vivo lymph node PET imaging with *As-SPION and T2-MRI with SPIONs. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [20]. Copyright 2013, Wiley-VCH.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
a) Actively-targeted PET/T1-MR dual-modality imaging of tumors with 64Cu-Mn3O4-TRC105 NPs. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [29]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society. b) Schematic illustration of the formation of 64Cu-MnO NPs. c) Passively-targeting PET/T1-MR dual-modality imaging of tumors with 64Cu-MnO NPs. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [28]. Copyright 2010, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
a) Schematic illustration of constructing PET/optical dual-modality imaging nanoprobes. b) Schematic of the hybrid (PET/optical) imaging nanoprobes, C dots, showing the core-containing Cy5 dye and surface-attached PEG chains that bear cRGDY peptide ligands (binding to human αvβ3 integrin–expressing tumors) and 124I radiolabels. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [8b]. Copyright 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science. c) NP combinations with CL allow improved in vivo imaging (i.e., CL. CRET, and PET imaging). Reproduced with permission from Ref. [39]. Copyright 2017, Nature Publishing Group.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
a) Negative-stained TEM image of dried nanonaps. Scale bar, 50 nm. b) Multimodal intestinal transverse plane in a mouse with PA signal (color) and simultaneous US (grey) acquisition following gavage of 100 ODs of nanonaps. c) Nanonap movement in the intestine. Black arrow shows inflow and white arrow shows outflow. d) Nanonap labeling using 64Cu. e) Representative PET imaging of nanonaps. 100 ODs of 64Cu-labelled nanonaps were gavaged, and mice were imaged at the indicated time points. Scale bars, 1 cm. f) Representative 0.8-mm-thick coronal slices through the mouse, 3 h after gavage. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright 2014, Nature Publishing Group.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
a-c) Schematic illustration of magnetic NPs as matrices to construct PET-based tri-or-more modality imaging nanoprobes. Lower panel in a-c): TEM images of Bi2Se3/FeSe2, IONPs@UCNPs (NaYF4:Yb/Tm), and IONPs-Au nanostructures, respectively. d) PET/MR/CT/PA tetra-modal imaging with 64Cu-Bi2Se3/FeSe2-PEG. a) and d) Reproduced with permission from Ref. [9b]. Copyright 2016, Wiley-VCH. b) Fe3O4@UCNPs, Reproduced with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. c) IONPs-Au, Reproduced with permission from Ref. [59]. Copyright 2013, Elsevier Ltd.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
a) Schematic diagram of the PoP–UCNP structure and 64Cu radiolabeling. b) TEM image of Pop-UCNP. High-magnification inset demonstrates the crystalline structure and UCNP core/shell geometry. c) Hexamodal in vivo lymphatic imaging using PoP–UCNPs in mice via fluorescence imaging (FL), upconversion luminescence (UCL) imaging, PET, PET/CT, Cerenkov luminescence (CL) imaging, and photoacoustic (PA) imaging. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [9c]. Copyright 2015, Wiley-VCH. d) Schematic diagram of the synthesis of 64Cu-MNPs for PET/MRI/PA multimodality molecular imaging of tumors. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [66]. Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weissleder R, Pittet MJ, Nature 2008, 452, 580–589. - PMC - PubMed
    1. a) Ametamey SM, Honer M, Schubiger PA, Chem. Rev 2008, 108, 1501–1516; - PubMed
    2. b) Phelps ME, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 2000, 97, 9226–9233. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Judenhofer MS, Wehrl HF, Newport DF, Catana C, Siegel SB, Becker M, Thielscher A, Kneilling M, Lichy MP, Eichner M, Klingel K, Reischl G, Widmaier S, Rocken M, Nutt RE, Machulla H-J, Uludag K, Cherry SR, Claussen CD, Pichler BJ, Nat. Med 2008, 14, 459–465. - PubMed
    1. Delso G, Furst S, Jakoby B, Ladebeck R, Ganter C, Nekolla SG, Schwaiger M, Ziegler SI, J. Nucl. Med 2011, 52, 1914–1922. - PubMed
    1. a) Lee DE, Koo H, Sun IC, Ryu JH, Kim K, Kwon IC, Chem. Soc. Rev 2012, 41, 2656–2672; - PubMed
    2. b) Shin TH, Choi Y, Kim S, Cheon J, Chem. Soc. Rev 2015, 44, 4501–4516; - PubMed
    3. c) Rieffel J, Chitgupi U, Lovell JF, Small 2015, 11, 4445–4461. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources