Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 3;18(1):157.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1260-9.

Verbal and non-verbal communication skills including empathy during history taking of undergraduate medical students

Affiliations

Verbal and non-verbal communication skills including empathy during history taking of undergraduate medical students

Daniela Vogel et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Verbal and non-verbal aspects of communication as well as empathy are known to have an important impact on the medical encounter. The aim of the study was to analyze how well final year undergraduate medical students use skills of verbal and non-verbal communication during history-taking and whether these aspects of communication correlate with empathy and gender.

Methods: During a three steps performance assessment simulating the first day of a resident 30 medical final year students took histories of five simulated patients resulting in 150 videos of physician-patient encounters. These videos were analyzed by external rating with a newly developed observation scale for the verbal and non-verbal communication and with the validated CARE-questionnaire for empathy. One-way ANOVA, t-tests and bivariate correlations were used for statistical analyses.

Results: Female students showed signicantly higher scores for verbal communication in the case of a female patient with abdominal pain (p < 0.05), while male students started the conversations significantly more often with an open question (p < 0.05) and interrupted the patients significantly later in two cases than female students (p < 0.05). The number of W-questions asked by all students was significantly higher in the case of the female patient with abdominal pain (p < 0.05) and this patient was interrupted after the beginning of the interview significantly earlier than the patients in the other four cases (p < 0.001). Female students reached significantly higher scores for non-verbal communication in two cases (p < 0.05) and showed significantly more empathy than male students in the case of the female patient with abdominal pain (p < 0.05). In general, non-verbal communication correlated significantly with verbal communication and with empathy while verbal communication showed no significant correlation with empathy.

Conclusions: Undergraduate medical students display differentiated communication behaviour with respect to verbal and non-verbal aspects of communication and empathy in a performance assessment and special differences could be detected between male and female students. These results suggest that explicit communication training and feedback might be necessary to raise students' awareness for the different aspects of communication and their interaction.

Keywords: CARE; Communications skills; Empathy; History taking; Undergraduate medical education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Ethics Committee of the Chamber of Physicians approval (PV3649). Participation was voluntary, anonymized and with written consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

SH has a position as Section Editor to BMC Medical Education. DV and MM declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Buller M, Buller D. Physicians’ communication style and patient satisfaction. J Health Soc Behav. 1987;28(4):375–388. doi: 10.2307/2136791. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kiesler D, Auerbach S. Integrating measurement of control and affiliation in studies of physician–patient interaction: the interpersonal circumplex. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(9):1707–1722. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00558-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zandbelt L, Smets E, Oort F, Godfried M, Haes H. Satisfaction with the outpatient encounter: a comparison of patients’ and physicians’ views. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(11):1088–1095. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30420.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Makoul G. Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the Kalamazoo consensus statement. Acad Med. 2001;76(4):390–393. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200104000-00021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cegala D, Marinelli T, Post D. The effects of patient communication skills training on compliance. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(1):57–64. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.1.57. - DOI - PubMed