Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Aug;68(673):e551-e558.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X697913. Epub 2018 Jul 2.

Variation in anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation between English clinical commissioning groups: an observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Variation in anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation between English clinical commissioning groups: an observational study

John Robson et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Despite improvement in anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (AF), substantial variation in anticoagulation persists between clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) and regions in England.

Aim: To identify reasons for variation between English CCGs in anticoagulation for AF.

Design and setting: A 4-year observational study from 2012/2013 to 2015/2016, of the national Quality and Outcomes Framework.

Method: Multiple regression and Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to analyse anticoagulation for AF in relation to older age, Index of Multiple Deprivation, prescription of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), and exception reporting, as well as stroke hospital admission and mortality.

Results: The proportion of eligible patients in England prescribed anticoagulants for AF without exceptions for clinical complexity or patient dissent increased from 65.1% in 2012/2013 to 77.9% in 2015/2016. In 2015, 290 920 additional eligible people were anticoagulated in association with use of the CHA2DS2VASc rather than CHADS2 score. From 2012 to 2015, exception reporting almost halved from 20% to 10.2%. Variation in CCG anticoagulation was not associated with deprivation or NOAC use. There was a strong negative association between exception reporting representing patient complexity and anticoagulation performance, accounting for 57% of the variation in anticoagulation without exceptions (multiple regression coefficient = -0.81; 95% confidence intervals = -0.92 to -0.71; P<0.001).

Conclusion: Anticoagulation for AF has improved substantially in England in association with considerable increases in the eligible population as a result of decreased exception reporting and the use of the CHA2DS2VASc score. There is still substantial room for improvement in most CCGs because, even allowing for exceptions, nine out of 10 CCGs failed to achieve 90% anticoagulation.

Keywords: anticoagulation; atrial fibrillation; primary care; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Atrial fibrillation QOF AF007. Percentage of exceptions to anticoagulation by CCG, in relation to proportion on anticoagulation without exceptions. AF = atrial fibrillation. CCG = clinical commissioning group. QOF = Quality and Outcomes Framework.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Proportion of people with atrial fibrillation CHA2DS2VASc score ≥2 on anticoagulation. Distribution in English CCGs by region with and without exceptions 2015/2016. CCG = clinical commissioning group.

References

    1. NHS Digital Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) — 2015–16. 2016 https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/qua... (accessed 11 Jun 2018)
    1. Doran T, Kontopantelis E, Reeves D, et al. Setting performance targets in pay for performance programmes: what can we learn from QOF? BMJ. 2014;348:g1595. - PubMed
    1. Harrison MJ, Dusheiko M, Sutton M, et al. Effect of a national primary care pay for performance scheme on emergency hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: controlled longitudinal study. BMJ. 2014;349:g6423. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dusheiko M, Gravelle H, Martin S, Smith PC. Quality of disease management and risk of mortality in English primary care practices. Health Serv Res. 2015;50(5):1452–1471. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walker S, Mason AR, Claxton K, et al. Value for money and the Quality and Outcomes Framework in primary care in the UK NHS. Br J Gen Pract. 2010. . - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources