Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jun 19:9:1308.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01308. eCollection 2018.

The Binomial Parasite-Host Immunity in the Healing Process and in Reactivation of Human Tegumentary Leishmaniasis

Affiliations
Review

The Binomial Parasite-Host Immunity in the Healing Process and in Reactivation of Human Tegumentary Leishmaniasis

Fatima Conceição-Silva et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Leishmaniasis is a vector-borne infectious disease caused by different species of protozoa from the Leishmania genus. Classically, the disease can be classified into two main clinical forms: Visceral (VL) and Tegumentary (TL) leishmaniasis. TL is a skin/mucosal granulomatous disease that manifests mainly as cutaneous localized or disseminated ulcers, papules diffusely distributed, mucosal lesions or atypical lesions. Once the etiology of the infection is confirmed, treatment can take place, and different drugs can be administered. It has already been shown that, even when the scar is clinically evident, inflammation is still present in the native tissue, and the decrease of the inflammatory process occurs slowly during the 1st years after clinical healing. The maintenance of residual parasites in the scar tissue is also well documented. Therefore, it is no longer a surprise that, under some circumstances, therapeutic failure and/or lesion reactivation occurs. All over the years, an impressive amount of data on relapses, treatment resistance and lesion reactivation after healing has been collected, and several factors have been pointed out as having a role in the process. Different factors such as Leishmania species, parasite variability, Leishmania RNA virus 1, parasite load, parasite persistence, age, nutritional status, gender, co-morbidities, co-infection, pregnancy, immunosuppression, lesion duration, number and localization of lesions, drug metabolism, irregular treatment and individual host cellular immune response were described and discussed in the present review. Unfortunately, despite this amount of information, a conclusive understanding remains under construction. In addition, multifactorial influence cannot be discarded. In this context, knowing why leishmaniasis has been difficult to treat and control can help the development of new approaches, such as drugs and immunotherapy in order to improve healing maintenance. In this sense, we would like to highlight some of the findings that may influence the course of Leishmania infection and the therapeutic response, with an emphasis on TL.

Keywords: Leishmania parasites; co-morbidities; healing process; immunosuppression; leishmaniasis; lesion reactivation; patients; tegumentary leishmaniasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Tegumentary leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania braziliensis. (A) Atrophic scar post a successful treatment; (B) lesion reactivation post treatment. Photos kindly provided by Dr. M. R. Lyra and LaPClin Vigileish - National Institute of Infectology Evandro Chagas -INI- Fiocruz.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Summary of the main immunological features described in mucosal lesions, localized cutaneous leishmaniasis and skin scars of tegumentary leishmaniasis. Predominant cell subtypes were indicated for each clinical form. The blue squares represent the intensity of the parameters indicated in the figure.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Host and parasite factors that may influence the course of infection, the lesion healing and the reactivation of cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adaui V., Lye L. F., Akopyants N. S., Zimic M., Llanos-Cuentas A., Garcia L., et al. (2016). Association of the endobiont double-stranded RNA virus LRV1 with treatment failure for human Leishmaniasis Caused by Leishmania braziliensis in Peru and Bolivia. J. Infect. Dis. 213 112–121. 10.1093/infdis/jiv354 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aebischer T., Moody S. F., Handman E. (1993). Persistent of virulent Leishmania major in murine cutaneous Leishmaniasis: a possible hazard for the host. Infect. Immun. 61 220–226. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aksoy M., Doni N., Ozkul H. U., Yesilova Y., Ardic N., Yesilova A., et al. (2016). Pediatric cutaneous Leishmaniasis in an endemic region in turkey: a retrospective analysis of 8786 cases during 1998-2014. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 10:e0004835. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004835 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Almeida M. C., Vilhena V., Barral A., Barral-Netto M. (2003). Leishmanial infection: analysis of its first steps. A review. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 98 861–870. 10.1590/S0074-02762003000700001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. AlSamarai A. M., AlObaidi H. S. (2009). Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Iraq. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries 3 123–129. 10.3855/jidc.59 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources