Terlipressin versus norepinephrine as infusion in patients with septic shock: a multicentre, randomised, double-blinded trial
- PMID: 29971593
- DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5267-9
Terlipressin versus norepinephrine as infusion in patients with septic shock: a multicentre, randomised, double-blinded trial
Abstract
Purpose: Recent clinical data suggest that terlipressin, a vasopressin analogue, may be more beneficial in septic shock patients than catecholamines. However, terlipressin's effect on mortality is unknown. We set out to ascertain the efficacy and safety of continuous terlipressin infusion compared with norepinephrine (NE) in patients with septic shock.
Methods: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blinded trial, patients with septic shock recruited from 21 intensive care units in 11 provinces of China were randomised (1:1) to receive either terlipressin (20-160 µg/h with maximum infusion rate of 4 mg/day) or NE (4-30 µg/min) before open-label vasopressors. The primary endpoint was mortality 28 days after the start of infusion. Primary efficacy endpoint analysis and safety analysis were performed on the data from a modified intention-to-treat population.
Results: Between 1 January 2013 and 28 February 2016, 617 patients were randomised (312 to the terlipressin group, 305 to the NE group). The modified intention-to-treat population comprised 526 (85.3%) patients (260 in the terlipressin group and 266 in the NE group). There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality rate between the terlipressin group (40%) and the NE group (38%) (odds ratio 0.93 [95% CI 0.55-1.56]; p = 0.80). Change in SOFA score on day 7 was similar between the two groups: - 7 (IQR - 11 to 3) in the terlipressin group and - 6 (IQR - 10 to 5) in the NE group. There was no difference between the groups in the number of days alive and free of vasopressors. Overall, serious adverse events were more common in the terlipressin group than in the NE group (30% vs 12%; p < 0.001).
Conclusions: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blinded trial, we observed no difference in mortality between terlipressin and NE infusion in patients with septic shock. Patients in the terlipressin group had a higher number of serious adverse events.
Trial registration: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: ID NCT01697410.
Keywords: Norepinephrine; SOFA score; Septic shock; Terlipressin.
Comment in
-
Terlipressin or norepinephrine, or both in septic shock?Intensive Care Med. 2018 Nov;44(11):1964-1966. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5290-x. Epub 2018 Jul 13. Intensive Care Med. 2018. PMID: 30006892 No abstract available.
-
Preliminary results of synergy between norepinephrine and terlipressin during septic shock.Intensive Care Med. 2019 May;45(5):730-732. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-05514-9. Epub 2019 Feb 6. Intensive Care Med. 2019. PMID: 30725132 No abstract available.
-
Terlipressin or norepinephrine in septic shock: do we have the answer?J Thorac Dis. 2019 May;11(Suppl 9):S1270-S1273. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.05.07. J Thorac Dis. 2019. PMID: 31245106 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Terlipressin as a first choice in septic shock-not yet.J Thorac Dis. 2019 May;11(Suppl 9):S1384-S1386. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.03.49. J Thorac Dis. 2019. PMID: 31245140 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Terlipressin in the treatment of late phase catecholamine-resistant septic shock.Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Jun;59(116):1043-7. doi: 10.5754/hge10550. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012. PMID: 22580654 Clinical Trial.
-
Continuous terlipressin versus vasopressin infusion in septic shock (TERLIVAP): a randomized, controlled pilot study.Crit Care. 2009;13(4):R130. doi: 10.1186/cc7990. Epub 2009 Aug 10. Crit Care. 2009. PMID: 19664253 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock.N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 28;358(9):877-87. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067373. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 18305265 Clinical Trial.
-
Terlipressin for the treatment of septic shock in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Mar 5;20(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00965-4. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020. PMID: 32138657 Free PMC article.
-
TERLIPRESSIN COMBINED WITH NOREPINEPHRINE IN THE TREATMENT OF SEPTIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.Shock. 2023 Oct 1;60(4):479-486. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002204. Epub 2023 Aug 7. Shock. 2023. PMID: 37548701
Cited by
-
Emerging concepts in the care of patients with cirrhosis and septic shock.World J Hepatol. 2023 Apr 27;15(4):497-514. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i4.497. World J Hepatol. 2023. PMID: 37206653 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Non-catecholamine vasopressors in the treatment of adult patients with septic shock-evidence from meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.J Intensive Care. 2020 Oct 31;8(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s40560-020-00500-0. J Intensive Care. 2020. PMID: 33292658 Free PMC article.
-
Terlipressin as a first choice in septic shock-not yet.J Thorac Dis. 2019 May;11(Suppl 9):S1384-S1386. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.03.49. J Thorac Dis. 2019. PMID: 31245140 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Terlipressin for septic shock patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled study.J Intensive Care. 2019 Mar 12;7:16. doi: 10.1186/s40560-019-0369-1. eCollection 2019. J Intensive Care. 2019. PMID: 30923620 Free PMC article.
-
Vasopressor therapy in critically ill patients with shock.Intensive Care Med. 2019 Nov;45(11):1503-1517. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05801-z. Epub 2019 Oct 23. Intensive Care Med. 2019. PMID: 31646370 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical