Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep;12(5):1719-1727.
doi: 10.1177/1557988318785741. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

Patient Factors That Influence How Physicians Discuss Active Surveillance With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Qualitative Study

Affiliations

Patient Factors That Influence How Physicians Discuss Active Surveillance With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Qualitative Study

Joanna Veazey Brooks et al. Am J Mens Health. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

For men diagnosed with prostate cancer, making treatment decisions can be overwhelming. Navigating treatment options, along with potential treatment side effects, can be difficult, and patients often rely heavily on the advice of their physicians. This study was aimed at understanding more about the way urologists talk with their patients about one treatment option: active surveillance (AS), a recognized management strategy for men with low-risk prostate cancer that includes close observation and monitoring of the cancer. This study reports, through 22 interviews with urologists, that urologists believe patients are hesitant about AS for a number of reasons, including misperceptions about cancer severity, anxiety, aversion to repeated biopsies that accompany AS, or family member preferences. Because urologists play an influential role in educating patients about treatment options, the discussion around AS can be impacted by barriers that physicians believe matter for their patients. Improving awareness among urologists about what factors impact their patient education about low-risk prostate cancer is important. Identifying tools to improve shared decision making in this area could result in treatment decisions that are increasingly concordant with patients' values, concerns, and goals.

Keywords: active surveillance; low-risk prostate cancer; physician–patient communication; prostate cancer treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aday L. A., Andersen R. (1974). A framework for the study of access to medical care. Health Services Research, 9(3), 208–220. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adsul P., Wray R., Boyd D., Weaver N., Siddiqui S. (2016). Perceptions of urologists about the conversational elements leading to treatment decision-making among newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. Journal of Cancer Education, 32(3), 580–588. doi:10.1007/s13187-016-1025-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersen R. M. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(1), 1–10. - PubMed
    1. Bahnson R. R., Hanks G. E., Huben R. P., Kantoff P., Kozlowski J. M., Kuettel M. … National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2000). NCCN practice guidelines for prostate cancer. Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.), 14(11A), 111–119. - PubMed
    1. Berger Z. D., Yeh J. C., Carter H. B., Pollack C. E. (2014). Characteristics and experiences of patients with localized prostate cancer who left an active surveillance program. The Patient, 7(4), 427–436. doi:10.1007/s40271-014-0066-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types