Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Jul 4:362:k2505.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2505.

Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care

Yana Vinogradova et al. BMJ. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the associations between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and risks of bleeding, ischaemic stroke, venous thromboembolism, and all cause mortality compared with warfarin.

Design: Prospective open cohort study.

Setting: UK general practices contributing to QResearch or Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

Participants: 132 231 warfarin, 7744 dabigatran, 37 863 rivaroxaban, and 18 223 apixaban users without anticoagulant prescriptions for 12 months before study entry, subgrouped into 103 270 patients with atrial fibrillation and 92 791 without atrial fibrillation between 2011 and 2016.

Main outcome measures: Major bleeding leading to hospital admission or death. Specific sites of bleeding and all cause mortality were also studied.

Results: In patients with atrial fibrillation, compared with warfarin, apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.54 to 0.79) and intracranial bleeding (0.40, 0.25 to 0.64); dabigatran was associated with a decreased risk of intracranial bleeding (0.45, 0.26 to 0.77). An increased risk of all cause mortality was observed in patients taking rivaroxaban (1.19, 1.09 to 1.29) or on lower doses of apixaban (1.27, 1.12 to 1.45). In patients without atrial fibrillation, compared with warfarin, apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding (0.60, 0.46 to 0.79), any gastrointestinal bleeding (0.55, 0.37 to 0.83), and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (0.55, 0.36 to 0.83); rivaroxaban was associated with a decreased risk of intracranial bleeding (0.54, 0.35 to 0.82). Increased risk of all cause mortality was observed in patients taking rivaroxaban (1.51, 1.38 to 1.66) and those on lower doses of apixaban (1.34, 1.13 to 1.58).

Conclusions: Overall, apixaban was found to be the safest drug, with reduced risks of major, intracranial, and gastrointestinal bleeding compared with warfarin. Rivaroxaban and low dose apixaban were, however, associated with increased risks of all cause mortality compared with warfarin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare no support from any additional organisation for the submitted work. JHC is professor of clinical epidemiology at the University of Nottingham and unpaid director of QResearch, a not-for-profit organisation which is a joint partnership between the University of Nottingham and EMIS (commercial IT supplier for 60% of general practices in the UK). JHC is also a paid director of ClinRisk Limited, which produces open and closed source software to ensure the reliable and updatable implementation of clinical risk algorithms (including QRISK2) within clinical computer systems to help improve patient care. There have been no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Flow of the included patients for QResearch and Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) analysis
Fig 2
Fig 2
Proportion of patients prescribed different anticoagulants in each year by database
Fig 3
Fig 3
Patients with atrial fibrillation: adjusted Cox hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for outcomes associated with exposure to study drugs overall and by prescribed dose compared with warfarin. NA=not available. *P value<0.01. †The results were only available from the QResearch database.
Fig 4
Fig 4
Patients without atrial fibrillation: adjusted Cox hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for outcomes associated with exposure to study drugs overall and by prescribed dose compared with warfarin. NA=not available. *P value<0.01. †The results were only available from the QResearch database.
Fig 5
Fig 5
Patients with and without atrial fibrillation: adjusted Cox hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for outcomes associated with exposure to study drugs compared with apixaban. NA=not available. *P value<0.01. †The results were only available from the QResearch database.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Venous thromboembolism in adults admitted to hospital: reducing the risk. In: NICE clinical guideline 92, ed. London: NICE, 2010 https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng89
    1. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:857-67. 10.7326/0003-4819-146-12-200706190-00007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mant J, Hobbs FDR, Fletcher K, et al. BAFTA investigators. Midland Research Practices Network (MidReC) Warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in an elderly community population with atrial fibrillation (the Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged Study, BAFTA): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007;370:493-503. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61233-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Anticoagulants, including non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Key theraputic topic 2016;KTT16 https://www.nice.org.uk/advice/ktt16/chapter/Options-for-local-implement...
    1. Lip GYH. Atrial fibrillation in 2011: Stroke prevention in AF. Nat Rev Cardiol 2011;9:71-3. 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.203 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources