Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 31;14(2):301-321.
doi: 10.1332/174426417X14987303892451.

Right Here Right Now (RHRN) pilot study: testing a method of near-real-time data collection on the social determinants of health

Affiliations

Right Here Right Now (RHRN) pilot study: testing a method of near-real-time data collection on the social determinants of health

Lynn Naven et al. Evid Policy. .

Abstract

Background: Informing policy and practice with up-to-date evidence on the social determinants of health is an ongoing challenge. One limitation of traditional approaches is the time-lag between identification of a policy or practice need and availability of results. The Right Here Right Now (RHRN) study piloted a near-real-time data-collection process to investigate whether this gap could be bridged.

Methods: A website was developed to facilitate the issue of questions, data capture and presentation of findings. Respondents were recruited using two distinct methods - a clustered random probability sample, and a quota sample from street stalls. Weekly four-part questions were issued by email, Short Messaging Service (SMS or text) or post. Quantitative data were descriptively summarised, qualitative data thematically analysed, and a summary report circulated two weeks after each question was issued. The pilot spanned 26 weeks.

Results: It proved possible to recruit and retain a panel of respondents providing quantitative and qualitative data on a range of issues. The samples were subject to similar recruitment and response biases as more traditional data-collection approaches. Participants valued the potential to influence change, and stakeholders were enthusiastic about the findings generated, despite reservations about the lack of sample representativeness. Stakeholders acknowledged that decision-making processes are not flexible enough to respond to weekly evidence.

Conclusion: RHRN produced a process for collecting near-real-time data for policy-relevant topics, although obtaining and maintaining representative samples was problematic. Adaptations were identified to inform a more sustainable model of near-real-time data collection and dissemination in the future.

Keywords: evidence; policy; real-time; technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Example of a question on money worries issued during the RHRN pilot study
Figure 2
Figure 2. Sampling, recruitement and retention outcomes

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barr B, Bambra C, Smith K. For the good of the cause: generating evidence to inform social policies that reduce health inequalities. In: Smith KE, Bambra C, Hill SE, editors. Health Inequalities: Critical perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. pp. 252–64.
    1. Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Maylahn CM. Evidence-based public health: A fundamental concept for public health practice. Annual Review of Public Health. 2009;30:175–201. - PubMed
    1. Bryman A. Social research methods. 3rd edn. NewYork: Oxford University Press; 2008.
    1. Caron-Flinterman JF, Broerse JEW, Bunders JFG. The experiential knowledge of patients: A new resource for biomedical research? Social Science & Medicine. 2005;60(11):2575–84. - PubMed
    1. Chretien J, Tomich NE, Gaydos JC, Kelley PW. Real-time public health surveillance for emergency preparedness. American Journal of Public Health. 2009;99(8):1360–63. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources