Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Feb;29(2):501-508.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5572-2. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in diagnostic work-up of female infertility - comparison with conventional hysterosalpingography: a randomised study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in diagnostic work-up of female infertility - comparison with conventional hysterosalpingography: a randomised study

Manuelle Volondat et al. Eur Radiol. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To compare diagnostic accuracy of MR-hysterosalpingography (MR-HSG) and conventional hysterosalpingography (X-HSG) in the evaluation of female infertility.

Methods: Forty women received prospectively both X-HSG, the gold standard technique, and MR-HSG on the same day but the order in which they were conducted was randomised. A 1.5 Tesla MRI was performed with classical sequences for pelvic analysis and an additional 3D T1-weighted sequence with intra-uterine injection of gadolinium. Two radiologists independently interpreted X-HSG and MR-HSG according to randomisation, blinded to the other results. They both then performed a second interpretation of MR-HSG blinded to the first reading with a minimum time delay of 1 week. Diagnostic performance of MR-HSG for analysis of tubal and intracavity abnormalities was evaluated by calculating sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).

Results: Twenty-six patients were included. Diagnostic performance of MR-HSG was: Se: 91.7% (95% CI 61.5-99.8); Sp: 92.9% (95% CI 66.1-99.8) ; PPV: 91.7% (95% CI 61.5-99.8); NPV: 92.9% (95% CI 66.1-99.8). Pain analysis showed a significant statistical difference between the two procedures: average VAS for X-HSG was 4.43 (95% CI 3.50-5.36) versus 3.46 (95% CI 2.62-4.31) for MR-HSG, p=0,01. Intra- and inter-rater agreements for detection of tubal or intracavity abnormalities were 0.92 (95% CI 0.78-1.00) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.52-1.00).

Conclusion: MR-HSG is a well-tolerated technique demonstrating high accuracy in investigating tubal patency and intra-uterine abnormalities for diagnostic work-up of female infertility.

Key points: • MR-hysterosalpingography is an innovative technique. • Hysterosalpingography can be used to investigate tubal patency and intracavity abnormalities. • Hysterosalpingography is a potential 'one-stop-shop' imaging technique for a single comprehensive examination of female infertility.

Keywords: Fallopian tubes; Female infertility; Hysterosalpingography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Uterus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Sep;175(3):774-6 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(8):1439-44 - PubMed
    1. Hum Reprod. 2002 Dec;17(12):3138-41 - PubMed
    1. Hum Reprod. 2006 May;21(5):1227-31 - PubMed
    1. J Radiol. 2008 Jan;89(1 Pt 2):172-83 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources