Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Jul 5;18(1):836.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5661-9.

A haven of green space: learning from a pilot pre-post evaluation of a school-based social and therapeutic horticulture intervention with children

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A haven of green space: learning from a pilot pre-post evaluation of a school-based social and therapeutic horticulture intervention with children

Anna Chiumento et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Research suggests outdoor activity in green spaces is important for children's mental, emotional and social wellbeing. A recognised green space intervention is "Social and Therapeutic Horticulture" (STH). We discuss findings from a pilot STH intervention, "A Haven of Green Space" conducted in North West England. The target group were school children aged 9-15 years experiencing behavioural, emotional and social difficulties. This exploratory study aims to assess the mental wellbeing of the children pre- and post-intervention, and assess the value of the evaluation methods and "Five Ways to Wellbeing" evaluation framework.

Methods: The intervention involved 6 monthly sessions with two horticulturists and a psychotherapist. Sessions were participatory with the development of selected greenspaces at each school directed by the children. Evaluation was situated in the "Five Ways to Wellbeing" framework, using a mixed-methods pre- post-evaluation design. Existing public mental health evaluation methodologies were adapted for use with school children: Mental Well Being Impact Assessment (MWIA) and Wellbeing Check Cards. The MWIA was analysed qualitatively identifying over-arching themes. The quantitative wellbeing check cards were analysed by mean score comparison.

Results: Results were collected from 36 children across the three participating schools, and suggest that the Haven Green Space intervention was associated with improved mental wellbeing. MWIA factors relating to mental wellbeing ("emotional wellbeing" and "self-help") were positively impacted in all three schools. However, findings from the wellbeing check cards challenge this, with worsening scores across many domains.

Conclusions: A key study limitation is the pilot nature of the intervention and challenges in adapting evaluation methods to context and age-range. However, results indicate that group based socially interactive horticulture activities facilitated by trained therapists are associated with positive impacts upon the mental and emotional wellbeing of children experiencing behavioural, emotional and social difficulties. Further research is needed to verify this, and to support using the "Five Ways" in intervention development and evaluation. Finally, we recommend continued efforts to develop age-appropriate evaluation methods.

Keywords: Behavioural, emotional and social problems; Children and young people; Community-based; Greenspace; Mental health and psychosocial wellbeing; Mixed-methods; Pilot intervention; Schools; Therapeutic horticulture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Research and Development Office of the NHS trust in which the CAMHS team were embedded independently assessed the study protocol and decided that it warrented classification as a “service evaluation”. The evaluation was therefore exempt from requiring ethical committee review and approval. Informed written consent from the children’s parents was obtained in the majority of cases. Where the parent’s literacy required it, a member of the school staff not associated with the study read out the participant information sheet and signed the parent’s verbal agreement on the consent form. This approach was approved by the Research and Development Office of the NHS Trust providing ethical oversight of the service evaluation. In line with the participatory approach to evaluation additional informed verbal assent of the children was gathered at opening MWIA workshops.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example grid for domain increasing resilience and community assets from School C
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Wellbeing check card

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams S, Savahl S. Nature as children's space: a systematic review. J Environ Educ. 2017;48(5):291–321. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2017.1366160. - DOI
    1. McCormick R. Does access to green space impact the mental well-being of children: a systematic review. J Pediatr Nurs. 2017;37:3–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2017.08.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bell S, Hamilton V, Montarzino A, Rothnie H, Travlou P, and Alves S. Greenspace Scotland Research Report: Greenspace and quality of life; a critical literature review. 2008 [Available from: http://greenspacescotland.org.uk/SharedFiles/Download.aspx?pageid=133&mi.... Accessed 12 June 2018.
    1. Croucher K, Myers L, Bretherton J. The Links Between Green Space and Health: A Critical Literature Review, Stirling: Greenspace Scotland. Stirling; 2007.
    1. Gill T, Children and Nature . A quasi-systematic review of the empirical evidence. A report for the London sustainable development commission. London: greater London authority; 2011.

Publication types