Epinephrine Versus Norepinephrine for Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction
- PMID: 29976291
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.051
Epinephrine Versus Norepinephrine for Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction
Abstract
Background: Vasopressor agents could have certain specific effects in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) after myocardial infarction, which may influence outcome. Although norepinephrine and epinephrine are currently the most commonly used agents, no randomized trial has compared their effects, and intervention data are lacking.
Objectives: The goal of this paper was to compare in a prospective, double-blind, multicenter, randomized study, the efficacy and safety of epinephrine and norepinephrine in patients with CS after acute myocardial infarction.
Methods: The primary efficacy outcome was cardiac index evolution, and the primary safety outcome was the occurrence of refractory CS. Refractory CS was defined as CS with sustained hypotension, end-organ hypoperfusion and hyperlactatemia, and high inotrope and vasopressor doses.
Results: Fifty-seven patients were randomized into 2 study arms, epinephrine and norepinephrine. For the primary efficacy endpoint, cardiac index evolution was similar between the 2 groups (p = 0.43) from baseline (H0) to H72. For the main safety endpoint, the observed higher incidence of refractory shock in the epinephrine group (10 of 27 [37%] vs. norepinephrine 2 of 30 [7%]; p = 0.008) led to early termination of the study. Heart rate increased significantly with epinephrine from H2 to H24 while remaining unchanged with norepinephrine (p < 0.0001). Several metabolic changes were unfavorable to epinephrine compared with norepinephrine, including an increase in cardiac double product (p = 0.0002) and lactic acidosis from H2 to H24 (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: In patients with CS secondary to acute myocardial infarction, the use of epinephrine compared with norepinephrine was associated with similar effects on arterial pressure and cardiac index and a higher incidence of refractory shock. (Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Epinephrine and Norepinephrine in Cardiogenic Shock [OptimaCC]; NCT01367743).
Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; cardiogenic shock; epinephrine; norepinephrine; vasopressor.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Norepinephrine as a First-Line Inopressor in Cardiogenic Shock: Oversimplification or Best Practice?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 10;72(2):183-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.052. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29976292 No abstract available.
-
Norepinephrine Versus Epinephrine in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Do We Have an Answer?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Nov 6;72(19):2412. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.100. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 30384900 No abstract available.
-
Reply: Norepinephrine Versus Epinephrine in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Do We Have an Answer?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Nov 6;72(19):2413. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.008. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 30384901 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of norepinephrine-dobutamine to epinephrine for hemodynamics, lactate metabolism, and organ function variables in cardiogenic shock. A prospective, randomized pilot study.Crit Care Med. 2011 Mar;39(3):450-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ffe0eb. Crit Care Med. 2011. PMID: 21037469 Clinical Trial.
-
Increasing mean arterial pressure in cardiogenic shock secondary to myocardial infarction: effects on hemodynamics and tissue oxygenation.Shock. 2014 Apr;41(4):269-74. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000099. Shock. 2014. PMID: 24509521 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of equipressor doses of norepinephrine, epinephrine, and phenylephrine on septic myocardial dysfunction.Anesthesiology. 2012 May;116(5):1083-91. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31824f9669. Anesthesiology. 2012. PMID: 22407285
-
Vasopressor use in cardiogenic shock.Curr Opin Crit Care. 2020 Aug;26(4):411-416. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000743. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2020. PMID: 32487842 Review.
-
Vasopressors for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2019 Feb;114(1):21-29. doi: 10.1007/s00063-017-0378-6. Epub 2017 Dec 4. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2019. PMID: 29204662 Review. English.
Cited by
-
Treatments targeting inotropy.Eur Heart J. 2019 Nov 21;40(44):3626-3644. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy600. Eur Heart J. 2019. PMID: 30295807 Free PMC article.
-
Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Interventional Approach to Management in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories.Curr Cardiol Rev. 2022;18(2):e251121198293. doi: 10.2174/1573403X17666211125090929. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2022. PMID: 34823461 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of concomitant vasoactive treatment and mechanical left ventricular unloading in a porcine model of profound cardiogenic shock.Crit Care. 2020 Mar 18;24(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2816-8. Crit Care. 2020. PMID: 32188462 Free PMC article.
-
Korean Society of Heart Failure Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure: Advanced and Acute Heart Failure.Int J Heart Fail. 2023 Jul 13;5(3):111-126. doi: 10.36628/ijhf.2023.0019. eCollection 2023 Jul. Int J Heart Fail. 2023. PMID: 37554692 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Management of Cardiogenic Shock: Present and Future.Tex Heart Inst J. 2023 May 1;50(3):e238119. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-23-8119. Tex Heart Inst J. 2023. PMID: 37313619 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical