Comparing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Treatment of Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Results From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 29976305
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.05.007
Comparing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Treatment of Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Results From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was the prospective and randomized evaluation of cardiovascular endpoints and quality of life in patients with stable coronary artery disease comparing a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-based management strategy with a coronary angiography-based approach.
Background: Evidence from trials prospectively evaluating the role of CMR in clinical pathways and decision processes is limited.
Methods: Patients with symptomatic CAD were randomized to diagnostic coronary angiography (group 1) or adenosine stress CMR (group 2). The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Quality of life was assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire at baseline and during follow-up.
Results: Two hundred patients were enrolled. In group 1, 45 revascularizations (45.9%) were performed. In group 2, 27 patients (28.1%) were referred to revascularization because of ischemia on CMR. At 12-month follow-up, 7 primary events occurred: 3 in group 1 (event rate 3.1%) and 4 in group 2 (event rate 4.2%), with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.72). Within the next 2 years, 6 additional events could be observed, giving 4 events in group 1 and 9 events in group 2 (event rate 4.1% vs. 9.4%; p = 0.25). Group 2 showed significant quality-of-life improvement after 1 year in comparison to group 1.
Conclusions: A CMR-based management strategy for patients with stable coronary artery disease was safe, reduced revascularization procedures, and resulted in better quality of life at 12-month follow-up, though noninferiority could not be proved. Optimal timing for reassessment remains to be investigated. (Magnetic Resonance Adenosine Perfusion Imaging as Gatekeeper of Invasive Coronary Intervention [MAGnet]; NCT02580851).
Keywords: cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging; inducible ischemia; patient management; prognosis and outcomes; stable coronary artery disease.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging to Guide Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jul;11(7):997-999. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.05.020. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018. PMID: 29976306 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Magnetic resonance Adenosine perfusion imaging as Gatekeeper of invasive coronary intervention (MAGnet): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2017 Jul 28;18(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2101-6. Trials. 2017. PMID: 28754155 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Stress Perfusion CMR in Patients With Known and Suspected CAD: Prognostic Value and Optimal Ischemic Threshold for Revascularization.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 May;10(5):526-537. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Apr 12. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017. PMID: 28412420
-
Prediction of Coronary Revascularization in Stable Angina: Comparison of FFRCT With CMR Stress Perfusion Imaging.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Apr;13(4):994-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.06.028. Epub 2019 Aug 14. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020. PMID: 31422146
-
Effects of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Meta-Analysis With Individual Patient-Level Data From 2,345 Randomized Patients.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 14;9(21):2232-2239. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Oct 12. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 27744039 Review.
-
The prognostic value of normal stress cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jul;6(4):574-82. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000035. Epub 2013 Jun 14. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23771988 Review.
Cited by
-
The current landscape of imaging recommendations in cardiovascular clinical guidelines: toward an imaging-guided precision medicine.Radiol Med. 2020 Nov;125(11):1013-1023. doi: 10.1007/s11547-020-01286-9. Epub 2020 Sep 22. Radiol Med. 2020. PMID: 32964326 Free PMC article.
-
Non-invasive Imaging in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusions of the Coronary Arteries-What Does the Interventionalist Need for Success?Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Aug 30;8:713625. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.713625. eCollection 2021. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021. PMID: 34527713 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance accurately detects obstructive coronary artery disease in suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: a sub-analysis of the CARMENTA Trial.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021 Mar 22;23(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12968-021-00723-6. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021. PMID: 33752696 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Randomised trial of stable chest pain investigation: 3-year clinical and quality of life results from CE-MARC 2.Open Heart. 2023 May;10(1):e002221. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002221. Open Heart. 2023. PMID: 37130657 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Age- and gender-related normal references of right ventricular strain values by tissue tracking cardiac magnetic resonance: results from a Chinese population.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019 Aug;9(8):1441-1450. doi: 10.21037/qims.2019.08.13. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019. PMID: 31559173 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous