Appropriate comparisons of tuberculosis latency structures with empiric data

Affiliations

¹ Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia. Electronic address: james.trauer@monash.edu.
² University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
³ James Cook University, Douglas, QLD, Australia.

Comment

James M Trauer et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Jul.

. 2018 Jul;18(7):720-721.

doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30339-6.

¹ Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia. Electronic address: james.trauer@monash.edu.
² University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
³ James Cook University, Douglas, QLD, Australia.

No abstract available

Comment in

Evidence sources on the natural history of latent tuberculosis infection.
Menzies NA, Cohen T, Salomon JA. Menzies NA, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Aug;18(8):834-835. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30406-7. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018. PMID: 30064672 No abstract available.

Progression from latent infection to active disease in dynamic tuberculosis transmission models: a systematic review of the validity of modelling assumptions.
Menzies NA, Wolf E, Connors D, Bellerose M, Sbarra AN, Cohen T, Hill AN, Yaesoubi R, Galer K, White PJ, Abubakar I, Salomon JA. Menzies NA, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Aug;18(8):e228-e238. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30134-8. Epub 2018 Apr 10. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018. PMID: 29653698 Free PMC article.