Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Sep;67(9):1836-1846.
doi: 10.2337/db18-0200. Epub 2018 Jul 5.

CD4 T Cells Reactive to Hybrid Insulin Peptides Are Indicators of Disease Activity in the NOD Mouse

Affiliations
Comparative Study

CD4 T Cells Reactive to Hybrid Insulin Peptides Are Indicators of Disease Activity in the NOD Mouse

Rocky L Baker et al. Diabetes. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

We recently established that hybrid insulin peptides (HIPs), formed in islet β-cells by fusion of insulin C-peptide fragments to peptides of chromogranin A or islet amyloid polypeptide, are ligands for diabetogenic CD4 T-cell clones. The goal of this study was to investigate whether HIP-reactive T cells were indicative of ongoing autoimmunity. MHC class II tetramers were used to investigate the presence, phenotype, and function of HIP-reactive and insulin-reactive T cells in NOD mice. Insulin-reactive T cells encounter their antigen early in disease, but they express FoxP3 and therefore may contribute to immune regulation. In contrast, HIP-reactive T cells are proinflammatory and highly diabetogenic in an adoptive transfer model. Because the frequency of antigen-experienced HIP-reactive T cells increases over progression of disease, they may serve as biomarkers of autoimmune diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HIP tet+ cells are present in the islets of NOD mice. A and C: Single-cell suspensions were prepared from the islets of nondiabetic NOD mice and stained with antibodies and tetramers. Tetramers contained the following peptides: HEL (HEL11–25), 2.5HIP (LQTLALWSRMD), 6.9HIP (LQTLALNAARDP), and ins B:9-23 mimotopes (insp8G [HLVERLYLVCGGEG] and insp8E [HLVERLYLVCGEEG]). Gates were set on live, CD45+, lineage-negative (Lin), CD4+ cells, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. A: Representative example of tetramer staining from the islets of one NOD mouse. Data are representative of five independent experiments. B: Single-cell suspensions were prepared from whole pancreas of young (3-, 6-, and 10-week-old) or diabetic NOD mice and stained with antibodies and tetramers. Each symbol represents an individual mouse, and a summary of six independent experiments is provided. C: Tetramer analysis in the islets of 17 nondiabetic NOD mice (aged 6–20 weeks); data are a summary of four independent experiments. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Phenotype of tet+ cells in the pLN vs. bLN at 3, 6, and 10 weeks in NOD mice. A: Single-cell suspensions were prepared from pLN (panc LN) or bLN (brac LN) from a 10-week-old NOD mouse. Cells were stained with antibodies and tetramers and then analyzed by flow cytometry. Tetramers contained the following peptides: 2.5HIP (LQTLALWSRMD), 6.9HIP (LQTLALNAARDP), and ins B:9-23 mimotopes (insp8G [HLVERLYLVCGGEG] and insp8E [HLVERLYLVCGEEG]). Gates were set on live, CD45+, lineage-negative (Lin), CD4+ cells. The percentage of CD44hiCD62Llo is reported for each population (numbers within boxes). B: Summary of three independent experiments per age-group for 3-week-old (n = 9), 6-week-old (n = 12), and 10-week-old (n = 11) NOD mice. Each symbol represents an individual mouse. ***P < 0.001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
HIP-reactive T cells are devoid of Tregs and secrete IFN-γ. A: FoxP3 expression in the spleen and pancreas (Pancr) of NOD or NOD.ChgA−/− mice from a representative experiment. Gates were set on live, CD45+, lineage-negative (Lin), CD4+ cells. B: FoxP3 expression in the pancreas and spleen in nondiabetic (12- to 20-week-old) NOD mice. Data are a summary of at least three independent experiments. Tetramers contained the following peptides: 2.5HIP (LQTLALWSRMD), 6.9HIP (LQTLALNAARDP), or ins B:9-23 mimotopes (insp8G [HLVERLYLVCGGEG] and insp8E [HLVERLYLVCGEEG]). C: FoxP3 expression in ChgA-sufficient or ChgA knockout (ChgAKO) mice. Experiments were performed using diabetic wild-type NOD mice or aged-matched NOD.ChgA−/− mice. DF: Splenocytes from diabetic NOD mice were cultured with or without antigen (Ag) in an IFN-γ ELISpot assay and the number of spots (cytokine-secreting cells) are reported. D: Assay plate wells from a representative experiment. Numbers to the upper right of each well indicate the number of spots counted. Duplicate wells are shown. E: Summary of three independent experiments. n = 10 mice. F: Correlation between the number of 2.5HIP tet+ events obtained by flow cytometry vs. number of spots obtained by ELISpot. Data are expressed per 106 splenocytes. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Antigen specificity and diabetogenicity of HIP-reactive T cells. A: tet+ cells are present in three BDC T-cell lines. Single-cell suspensions were stained with I-Ag7 tetramer. After 45 min, cells were counterstained with anti-CD4 and a viability dye before flow cytometry analysis. Gates were set on live CD4+ cells, and data are representative of two independent experiments for each T-cell line. Our results indicate that all three lines contained 2.5HIP tet+ cells, and both BDC-9 and BDC-10 contained 6.9HIP tet+ cells. tet+ cells were then sorted by FACS to obtain pure populations of tet+ cells. B: The islet-reactive T-cell clones PD-12.4.4 (insulin-reactive), BDC-6.9 (6.9HIP-reactive), and BDC-9.H1 were stained with antibodies and tetramers. Gates were set on live CD4+ cells, and data are representative of three independent experiments for each T-cell clone. C: To verify clonality, BDC-6.9 and BDC-9.H1 were stained with Vβ4 or Vβ6 antibodies. Gates were set on live CD4+ cells, and data are representative of at least four independent experiments for each T-cell clone. D: BDC-4.38 (insulin-reactive), BDC-6.9, or BDC-9.H1 T-cell clones from the BDC panel were challenged with NOD or NOD.IAPP−/− islets, and IFN-γ secretion was measured by ELISA. Data are representative of three independent experiments. E: The T-cell clone BDC-9.H1 was challenged with peptide antigens, and IFN-γ was measured by ELISA. Peptides used were insulin C-peptide and IAPP2 (added together in the same culture well), the 6.9 HIP core peptide (LQTLALNAARDP), or the full-length 6.9HIP (EVEDPQVAQLELGGGPGAGDLQTLALNAARDPNRESLDFLLV). Data are representative of three independent experiments. F: The T-cell clone BDC-11.1 is 2.5HIP reactive. The T-cell clone BDC-11.1 (2 × 104) was challenged with antigen (Ag) and antigen-presenting cells (2 × 104). After 24 h, supernatants from cell cultures were tested for the presence of IFN-γ by ELISA. Results are from duplicate wells from two independent experiments. G: The T-cell clones BDC-9.H1 or BDC-11.1 were adoptively transferred into young (6–14 days old) NOD mice (n = 3 recipient mice/group from two independent experiments per T-cell clone), and mice were monitored daily for signs of hyperglycemia. Mice were considered diabetic when blood glucose levels rose above 15 mmol/L. KO, knockout.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Frequency and phenotype of tet+ cells in the blood of NOD mice over time. Peripheral blood from NOD mice was collected by submandibular bleed, and PBMCs were isolated on a Ficoll gradient. PBMCs were then stained with antibodies and tetramers. Tetramers contained the following peptides: 2.5HIP (LQTLALWSRMD), 6.9HIP (LQTLALNAARDP), and ins B:9-23 mimotopes (insp8G [HLVERLYLVCGEEG] and insp8E [HLVERLYLVCGEEG]). A: A representative example of the frequency of tet+ cells in the PBMCs from a mouse in the cohort. B: A representative example of CD44 vs. CD62L expressed on mouse PBMCs. Gates were set on live, CD45+, CD4+, lineage-negative (Lin) cells or on tet+ cells (as indicated). C: Disease incidence in the cohort of 14 mice is shown in the left panel. The percentage of tet+ cells is shown in the center panel, and the percentage of CD44hiCD62Llo cells is represented in the right panel. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared with insulin tet+ cells (P < 0.05). *P < 0.05.

References

    1. Haskins K, Portas M, Bradley B, Wegmann D, Lafferty K. T-lymphocyte clone specific for pancreatic islet antigen. Diabetes 1988;37:1444–1448 - PubMed
    1. Haskins K, McDuffie M. Acceleration of diabetes in young NOD mice with a CD4+ islet-specific T cell clone. Science 1990;249:1433–1436 - PubMed
    1. Stadinski BD, Delong T, Reisdorph N, et al. . Chromogranin A is an autoantigen in type 1 diabetes. Nat Immunol 2010;11:225–231 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker RL, Bradley B, Wiles TA, et al. . Cutting edge: nonobese diabetic mice deficient in chromogranin a are protected from autoimmune diabetes. J Immunol 2016;196:39–43 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gottlieb PA, Delong T, Baker RL, et al. . Chromogranin A is a T cell antigen in human type 1 diabetes. J Autoimmun 2014;50:38–41 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms