Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Sep;26(9):570-574.
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000603.

Comparison of Patient Impact and Clinical Characteristics Between Urgency and Passive Fecal Incontinence Phenotypes

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of Patient Impact and Clinical Characteristics Between Urgency and Passive Fecal Incontinence Phenotypes

Avita K Pahwa et al. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To determine if categorizing fecal incontinence (FI) as urgency or passive FI is clinically meaningful, we compared clinical severity, quality of life, physical examination findings, and functional and anatomic deficits between women with urgency and passive FI.

Methods: This study is a prospective cross-sectional study of women with at least monthly FI. All women completed the St Mark's Vaizey and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaires and underwent anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound. We compared women with urgency FI to women with passive FI.

Results: Forty-six women were enrolled, 21 (46%) with urgency FI and 25 (54%) with passive FI. Clinical severity by Vaizey score did not differ between groups (urgency 11.7 ± 1.6 vs passive 11.0 ± 1.0, P = 0.51). Women with urgency FI had worse median (range) lifestyle and coping scores than passive FI (Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life: lifestyle domain 2.5 [1, 4] vs 3.8 [1, 4], P = 0.04; coping domain 1.7 [1, 3] vs 2.4 [0.9, 4], P < 0.01). Women with urgency FI had higher anal resting and squeeze pressure than passive FI (60 ± 4 mm Hg vs 49 ± 3 mm Hg, P = 0.03; 78 [48, 150] mm Hg vs 60 [40, 103], P = 0.05). Internal anal sphincter defects were more common in women with passive FI (41.7% vs 30.0%, P = 0.53) and external anal sphincter defects more common in women with urgency FI (25% vs 16.7%, P = 0.71), but this did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions: We identified functional and anatomic differences between women with urgency FI and passive FI. Pheonotyping women with FI into these subtypes is clinically meaningful.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02772874.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared they have no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Bharucha AE, Fletcher JG, Harper CM, et al.Relationship between symptoms and disordered continence mechanisms in women with idiopathic faecal incontinence. Gut 2005;54:546–555. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bezerra LR, Vasconcelos Neto JA, Vasconcelos CT, et al.Prevalence of unreported bowel symptoms in women with pelvic floor dysfunction and the impact on their quality of life. Int Urogynecol J 2014; 25:927–933. - PubMed
    1. Bharucha AE, Stroetz R, Feuerhak K, et al.A novel technique for bedside anorectal manometry in humans. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015;27: 1504–1508. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Engel AF, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, et al.Relationship of symptoms in faecal incontinence to specific sphincter abnormalities. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995;10:152–155. - PubMed
    1. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, et al.Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2006;130:1480–1491. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data