Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Jul;97(27):e11233.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011233.

Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) versus other cancer screenings in early diagnosis of lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Xiaojing Wang  1 , Hongli Liu, Yuanbing Shen, Wei Li, Yuqing Chen, Hongtao Wang
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) versus other cancer screenings in early diagnosis of lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Xiaojing Wang et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. It is often diagnosed at an advanced stage when treatment is no longer possible. Early population-based screening may provide an opportunity for early diagnosis and reduce mortality rates.

Methods: Study characteristics were collected and outcome data (lung cancer diagnosis and mortality) were extracted and used for meta-analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using OpenMetaAnalyst-0.1503 software. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess LDCT compared to other screening methods under the random-effects model. The I2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity.

Results: Pooling data from 4 studies (64,129 patients) showed a higher incidence of diagnosed lung cancer with LDCT screening (OR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.02-3.37), compared to other screening tools. However, no significant difference (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.78-1.64) was found in lung cancer mortality between both groups.

Conclusions: Although no significant difference was found between LDCT and other control groups in terms of lung cancer mortality, this meta-analysis suggests an increased diagnosis of lung cancer with LDCT as compared with other screening modalities. This meta-analysis displays the potential but also the limitations of LDCT for early lung cancer detection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Forest plot for detection of lung cancer incidence with LDCT versus control (with MILD included).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot for detection of lung cancer incidence with LDCT versus control (without MILD included).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot for detection of lung cancer mortality with LDCT versus control (with MILD included).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot for detection of lung cancer mortality with LDCT versus control (without MILD included).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review (CSR) 1975-2012 [Internet]. 2014; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD: [cited 2017 Dec 19, HL and YS]. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2012/.
    1. Berlin NI, Buncher CR, Fontana RS, et al. The National Cancer Institute Cooperative Early Lung Cancer Detection Program: results of the initial screen (prevalence). Am Rev Respir Dis 1984;130:545–9. - PubMed
    1. Frost JK, Ball WC, Levin ML, et al. Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Johns Hopkins study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984;130:549–54. - PubMed
    1. Kubik A, Parkin DM, Khlat M, et al. Lack of benefit from semi-annual screening for cancer of the lung: follow-up report of a randomized controlled trial on a population of high-risk males in Czechoslovakia. Int J Cancer 1990;45:26–33. - PubMed
    1. Melamed MR. Lung cancer screening results in the National Cancer Institute New York study. Cancer 2000;89(11 suppl):2356–62. - PubMed