Measuring interdisciplinarity in clinical practice with IPC59, a modified and improved version of IPC65
- PMID: 29979683
- PMCID: PMC6034788
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197484
Measuring interdisciplinarity in clinical practice with IPC59, a modified and improved version of IPC65
Abstract
Rationale: Interdisciplinarity is considered a key concept in the management of complex cases in healthcare. However, working in interdisciplinary teams requires the integration of many concepts and a large amount of effort. To help healthcare managers and professionals identify the strengths and weaknesses of their interdisciplinary team and to ensure its continuous improvement, we developed a tool called the IPC65.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the IPC65.
Methods: Based on a comprehensive review of the literature and qualitative and quantitative assessments, the IPC65 was developed. In this study, the analysis was based on 392 healthcare professionals and managers from short-term care settings who provided valid responses throughout the province of Quebec in Canada. Descriptive statistics, Cronbach's alpha values, and inter-item correlations were measured, and a principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted. Item discrimination was used to provide an improved version of the IPC65.
Results: The IPC65 showed good statistical results. The discriminant procedure provided the basis for shortening and improving the IPC65 to form the IPC59. Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.857 to 0.967 in IPC59, demonstrating very good reliability for all four dimensions. The PCA showed good validity.
Conclusion: The IPC59 can be used to assess the degree of integration of key concepts leading to interdisciplinarity.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Dinh T. Why Interdisciplinary Health Care Teams Are Better for Canadians and the Health System. The Conference Board of Canada. 2014. Consulted on 2018 May 07. Available from: http://www.conferenceboard.ca/economics/hot_eco_topics/default/14-03-13/...
-
- Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Reeves S. Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):CD000072 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub2 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Poulton BC, West MA. Effective multidisciplinary teamwork in primary health care. J Adv Nurs. 1993;18(6):918–25. - PubMed
-
- Heinemann GD, Zeiss AM, editors. Team Performance in Health Care. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2002. (Issues in the Practice of Psychology).
-
- Choi BCK, Pak AWP. Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clin Invest Med. 2006;29(6):351–64. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
