Online assessment of suicide stigma, literacy and effect in Australia's rural farming community
- PMID: 29980237
- PMCID: PMC6035410
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5750-9
Online assessment of suicide stigma, literacy and effect in Australia's rural farming community
Abstract
Background: In Australia, farming populations have been identified as having higher rates of suicide, in comparison to metropolitan, rural and regional communities. The reasons for this are unclear although stigma is considered a risk factor. This study was designed to understand the role of suicide stigma and suicide literacy and the relationship between these.
Methods: A mixed-methods online intervention was developed. This paper reports on baseline quantitative data (suicide stigma, suicide literacy and suicide effect) collected from male and female rural Australian participants (N = 536) with an experience of suicide.
Results: When compared with previous Australian community samples, our sample demonstrated higher levels of stigma and higher levels of suicide literacy. Males were more likely to have considered suicide than females. Females were more likely than males to report a devastating and ongoing effect of suicide bereavement, but less likely than a previous Australian community sample.
Conclusion: Results of this study reiterate the need for improved understanding of the risk factors and experience of suicide within the context of life and work in rural Australian farming communities and how 'best practice' can be adapted to improve stigma reduction and suicide prevention efforts.
Trial registration: This research project was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ( ACTRN12616000289415 ) on 7th March, 2016.
Keywords: Australia; Digital intervention; Farmer health; Mixed method research; Rural health; Suicide effect; Suicide literacy; Suicide stigma.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All participants were provided with an online plain language statement prior to registering to participate in the Ripple Effect online intervention. Completion of a Consent Form was required before being able to register to participate in the Ripple Effect intervention. Participants provided informed consent by checking an online tick box.
It was emphasised that the website was not designed for crisis response and information on seeking crisis support was provided on every page of the site.
The Ripple Effect has been approved by the Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (DUHREC) (2015–136).
Consent for publication
No applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The ripple effect: a digital intervention to reduce suicide stigma among farming men.BMC Public Health. 2020 May 29;20(1):813. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08954-5. BMC Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32471501 Free PMC article.
-
Research protocol for a digital intervention to reduce stigma among males with a personal experience of suicide in the Australian farming community.BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 29;16(1):1204. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3874-3. BMC Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27899094 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Suicide Stigma and Suicide Literacy in a Clinical Sample.Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2019 Aug;49(4):1136-1147. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12496. Epub 2018 Aug 6. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2019. PMID: 30079479
-
Suicide and accidental death in Australia's rural farming communities: a review of the literature.Rural Remote Health. 2014;14(1):2517. Epub 2014 Feb 20. Rural Remote Health. 2014. PMID: 24909931 Review.
-
Factors influencing suicide in older rural males: a review of Australian studies.Rural Remote Health. 2017 Oct-Dec;17(4):4020. doi: 10.22605/RRH4020. Epub 2017 Oct 15. Rural Remote Health. 2017. PMID: 29031280 Review.
Cited by
-
Participant perspectives of an online co-design process to develop a prevention-focused mental health and well-being platform for primary producers.Aust J Rural Health. 2022 Dec;30(6):719-729. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12911. Epub 2022 Aug 26. Aust J Rural Health. 2022. PMID: 36018893 Free PMC article.
-
Spanish validation of short-form version of Literacy of Suicide Scale (LOSS) and Stigma of Suicide Scale (SOSS).Brain Behav. 2023 Oct;13(10):e3182. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3182. Epub 2023 Jul 31. Brain Behav. 2023. PMID: 37522761 Free PMC article.
-
Combining Farmers' Preferences With Evidence-Based Strategies to Prevent and Lower Farmers' Distress: Co-design and Acceptability Testing of ifarmwell.JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jan 11;9(1):e27631. doi: 10.2196/27631. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022. PMID: 35014963 Free PMC article.
-
Profile and risk factors in farmer injuries: a review based on Haddon matrix and 5 E's risk reduction strategy.Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 6;12:1322884. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1322884. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38903585 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Suicide stigma and suicide literacy among Bangladeshi young adults: a cross-sectional study.Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 12;14:1160955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1160955. eCollection 2023. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 37252136 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hirsch JK, Cukrowicz CZ. Suicide in rural areas: an updated review of the literature. Journal of Rural Mental Health. 2014;38:65–78. doi: 10.1037/rmh0000018. - DOI
-
- Kennedy A, Maple MJ, McKay K, Brumby SA. Suicide and accidental death in Australia’s rural farming communities: a review of the literature. Rural Remote Health. 2014:2517. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical