Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jul 6;8(7):e020170.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020170.

Patient safety initiatives in obstetrics: a rapid review

Affiliations
Review

Patient safety initiatives in obstetrics: a rapid review

Jesmin Antony et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: This review was commissioned by WHO, South Africa-Country office because of an exponential increase in medical litigation claims related to patient safety in obstetrical care in the country. A rapid review was conducted to examine the effectiveness of quality improvement (QI) strategies on maternal and newborn patient safety outcomes, risk of litigation and burden of associated costs.

Design: A rapid review of the literature was conducted to provide decision-makers with timely evidence. Medical and legal databases (eg, MEDLINE, Embase, LexisNexis Academic, etc) and reference lists of relevant studies were searched. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, abstracted data and appraised risk of bias. Results were summarised narratively.

Interventions: We included randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of QI strategies targeting health systems (eg, team changes) and healthcare providers (eg, clinician education) to improve the safety of women and their newborns. Eligible studies were limited to trials published in English between 2004 and 2015.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: RCTs reporting on patient safety outcomes (eg, stillbirths, mortality and caesarean sections), litigation claims and associated costs were included.

Results: The search yielded 4793 citations, of which 10 RCTs met our eligibility criteria and provided information on over 500 000 participants. The results are presented by QI strategy, which varied from one study to another. Studies including provider education alone (one RCT), provider education in combination with audit and feedback (two RCTs) or clinician reminders (one RCT), as well as provider education with patient education and audit and feedback (one RCT), reported some improvements to patient safety outcomes. None of the studies reported on litigation claims or the associated costs.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that provider education and other QI strategy combinations targeting healthcare providers may improve the safety of women and their newborns during childbirth.

Keywords: knowledge synthesis; medical malpractice; obstetrics; patient safety; quality improvement; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram. Breakdown of the number of studies identified in the literature, assessed for eligibility, and finally included in the rapid review on patient safety initiatives in obstetrics. RCT, randomised clinical trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of bias. Aggregate Cochrane risk-of-bias appraisal results.

References

    1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a Safer Health System. 6: National Academies Press, 2000. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Guide for developing national patient safety policy and strategic plan. 2014.
    1. Pronovost PJ, Holzmueller CG, Ennen CS, et al. . Overview of progress in patient safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:5–10. 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American College of Obstetricians Gynecologists. Patient safety in obstetrics and gynecology. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 447. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1424–7. - PubMed
    1. Pettker CM, Thung SF, Lipkind HS, et al. . A comprehensive obstetric patient safety program reduces liability claims and payments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211:319–25. 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.04.038 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types