Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 7;8(7):e020411.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020411.

Care pathway and organisational features driving patient experience: statistical analysis of large NHS datasets

Kelsey Flott  1 , Ara Darzi  2 , Erik Mayer  2
Affiliations

Care pathway and organisational features driving patient experience: statistical analysis of large NHS datasets

Kelsey Flott et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the care pathway and organisational factors that predict patient experience.

Design: Statistical analysis of large National Health Service (NHS) datasets.

Setting andparticipants: England; acute NHS organisational-level data.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: The relationship of care pathway and organisational variables to organisation-level patient experience.

Results: A framework of 18 care pathway and organisational variables were created based on the existing literature. 11 of these correlated to patient experience in univariate analyses. Multicollinearity tests resulted in 1 of the 11 variables holding a correlation to another variable larger than r=0.70. A significant multilinear regression equation, including the final 10 variables, was found (F(10,108)=6.214, p<0.00), with an [Formula: see text] of 0.365. Two variables were significant in predicting better in patient experience: Amount of support to clinical staff (beta=0.2, p=0.02) and the proportion of staff who would recommend the trust as a place to work or receive treatment (beta=0.26, p=0.01). Two variables were significant in predicting a negative impact on the patient's rating of their experience: Number of patients spending over 4 hours from decision to admit to admission (beta=-1.99, p=0.03) and the percentage of estates and hotel services contracted out (beta=-0.23, p=0.01).

Conclusions: These results indicate that augmenting clinical support and investing in the mechanisms that facilitate positive staff experience is essential to delivering appropriate, informative and patient-centric care. Reducing wait times and the extent of external contracting within hospitals is also likely to improve patient ratings of experience. Understanding the relationship between patient experience and objective, measurable organisational features promote a more patient-centric interpretation of quality and compel a better use of patient experience feedback to drive improvement.

Keywords: health policy; organisational development; quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Darzi A. High quality care for all: NHS next stage review final report. London: Department of Health, 2008. - PubMed
    1. de Silva D. Measuring patient experience. London, UK: The Health Foundation, 2013. (Inspiring Improvement). Report No.: 18.
    1. Berwick DM. What ’patient-centered' should mean: confessions of an extremist. Health Aff 2009;28:w555–w565. 10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.w555 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Flott KM, Graham C, Darzi A, et al. . Can we use patient-reported feedback to drive change? The challenges of using patient-reported feedback and how they might be addressed. BMJ Qual Saf 2017;26:bmjqs-2016-005223 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005223 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kennedy DM. Creating an Excellent Patient Experience Through Service Education. J Patient Exp 2017;4:156–61. 10.1177/2374373517718351 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types