Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1197-1201.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy088.

A usability and safety analysis of electronic health records: a multi-center study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A usability and safety analysis of electronic health records: a multi-center study

Raj M Ratwani et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

To characterize the variability in usability and safety of EHRs from two vendors across four healthcare systems (2 Epic and 2 Cerner). Twelve to 15 emergency medicine physicians participated from each site and completed six clinical scenarios. Keystroke, mouse click, and video data were collected. From the six scenarios, two diagnostic imaging, laboratory, and medication tasks were analyzed. There was wide variability in task completion time, clicks, and error rates. For certain tasks, there were an average of a nine-fold difference in time and eight-fold difference in clicks. Error rates varied by task (X-ray 16.7% to 25%, MRI: 0 to 10%, Lactate: 0% to 14.3%, Tylenol: 0 to 30%; Taper: 16.7% to 50%). The variability in time, clicks, and error rates highlights the need for improved implementation optimization. EHR implementation, in addition to vendor design and development, is critical to usable and safe products.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Time on task by site and vendor.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Number of clicks by site and vendor.

References

    1. International Standards Organization. ISO 9241: Ergonomics of Human System Interaction.2010. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-210:ed-1:v1:en. Accessed February 2016.
    1. Institute of Medicine. Health IT and Patient Safety Building Safer Systems for Better Care. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 2012. - PubMed
    1. Howe J, Adams KT, Hettinger AZ, Ratwani RM.. Electronic health record usability issues and potential contribution to patient harm. J Am Med Assoc 2018; 31912: 1276–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Middleton B, Bloomrosen M, Dente MA, et al. Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20 (e1): e2–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koppel R, Kreda DA.. Healthcare IT usability and suitability for clinical needs: challenges of design, workflow, and contractual relations. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 157: 7–14. papers2://publication/uuid/93BD5076-2932-4681-BFCB-BF17C6192753. - PubMed

Publication types