Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Oct;18(5):e985-e995.
doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Screening Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Screening Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Xiao Zhu et al. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is a new image examination technology that has developed over the past few years. As CESM technology keeps improving, a current meta-analysis review is needed to systematically evaluate the potential diagnostic value of CESM.

Methods: A total of 18 studies were included in the review. Sensitivity, specificity, and other important parameters of CESM accuracy for breast cancer diagnosis were pooled and analyzed using random-effects models. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated for overall accuracy estimation.

Results: The summary estimates for CESM in the diagnosis of breast cancer were as follows: the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.91) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.82-0.85), respectively. Positive likelihood ratio was 3.73 (95% CI, 2.68-5.20), negative likelihood ratio was 0.10 (95% CI, 0.06-0.15), and diagnostic odds ratio was 71.36 (95% CI, 36.28-140.39). The area under the curve was 0.96 (standard error = 0.011).

Conclusion: CESM has a high diagnostic accuracy for evaluating breast cancer and can be considered as a useful test for initial assessment of breast lesions.

Keywords: Accuracy; Breast cancer; Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography; Meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types