Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 May 10:11:74-80.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.05.003. eCollection 2018 Sep.

Objective measurement of physical activity outcomes in lifestyle interventions among adults: A systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Objective measurement of physical activity outcomes in lifestyle interventions among adults: A systematic review

Valerie J Silfee et al. Prev Med Rep. .

Abstract

Valid, reliable, and direct measures of physical activity (PA) are critical to assessing the impact of lifestyle PA interventions. However, little is known about the extent to which objective measures have been used to assess the outcomes of lifestyle PA interventions. This systematic review had two aims: 1) evaluate the extent to which PA is measured objectively in lifestyle PA interventions targeting adults and 2) explore and summarize what objective measures have been used and what PA dimensions and metrics have been reported. Pubmed, Cochrane Central Register, and PsychInfo were searched for lifestyle PA interventions conducted between 2006 and 2016. Of the 342 articles that met the inclusion criteria, 239 studies measured PA via subjective measures and 103 studies measured PA via objective measures. The proportion of studies using objective measures increased from 4.4% to 70.6% from 2006 to 2016. All studies measuring PA objectively utilized wearable devices; half (50.5%) used pedometers only and 40.8% used accelerometers only. A majority of the 103 studies reported steps (73.8%) as their PA metric. Incorporating objective measures of PA should continue to be a priority in PA research. More work is needed to address the challenges of comprehensive and consistent collecting, reporting, and analyzing of PA metrics.

Keywords: Accelerometry; Interventions; Pedometer; Physical activity; Systematic review/meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consort diagram of physical activity lifestyle interventions.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Percentage of included studies that used objective measures of physical activity, by year of publication (N = 342).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Physical activity data reported by lifestyle interventions using objective measures of physical activity (N = 103)*. *Studies may have reported more than one data type.

References

    1. Ainsworth B., Cahalin L., Buman M., Ross R. The current state of physical activity assessment tools. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2015;57(4):387–395. - PubMed
    1. Aparicio-Ugarriza R., Mielgo-Ayuso J., Benito P.J. Physical activity assessment in the general population; instrumental methods and new technologies. Nutr. Hosp. 2015;31(3) - PubMed
    1. Baumann S., Groß S., Voigt L. Pitfalls in accelerometer-based measurement of physical activity: the presence of reactivity in an adult population. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 2018;28(3):1056–1063. - PubMed
    1. Blair S.N. Behavioral Health: A Handbook of Health Enhancement and Disease Prevention. 1984. How to assess exercise habits and physical fitness; pp. 424–447.
    1. Blair S.N., Kampert J.B., Kohl H.W. Influences of cardiorespiratory fitness and other precursors on cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in men and women. JAMA. 1996;276(3):205–210. - PubMed