Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jul;15(3):604-617.
doi: 10.1007/s13311-018-0642-3.

Robotic Rehabilitation and Spinal Cord Injury: a Narrative Review

Affiliations
Review

Robotic Rehabilitation and Spinal Cord Injury: a Narrative Review

Marwa Mekki et al. Neurotherapeutics. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Mobility after spinal cord injury (SCI) is among the top goals of recovery and improvement in quality of life. Those with tetraplegia rank hand function as the most important area of recovery in their lives, and those with paraplegia, walking. Without hand function, emphasis in rehabilitation is placed on accessing one's environment through technology. However, there is still much reliance on caretakers for many activities of daily living. For those with paraplegia, if incomplete, orthoses exist to augment walking function, but they require a significant amount of baseline strength and significant energy expenditure to use. Options for those with motor complete paraplegia have traditionally been limited to the wheelchair. While wheelchairs provide a modified level of independence, wheelchair users continue to face difficulties in access and mobility. In the past decade, research in SCI rehabilitation has expanded to include external motorized or robotic devices that initiate or augment movement. These robotic devices are used with 2 goals: to enhance recovery through repetitive, functional movement and increased neural plasticity and to act as a mobility aid beyond orthoses and wheelchairs. In addition, lower extremity exoskeletons have been shown to provide benefits to the secondary medical conditions after SCI such as pain, spasticity, decreased bone density, and neurogenic bowel. In this review, we discuss advances in robot-guided rehabilitation after SCI for the upper and lower extremities, as well as potential adjuncts to robotics.

Keywords: Robotics; exoskeleton; neurorehabilitation; paraplegia; spinal cord injury; tetraplegia..

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, Facts and Figures at a Glance. In: Birmingham UoAa, editor. Birmingham, AL2018.
    1. Lo C, Tran Y, Anderson K, Craig A, Middleton J. Functional Priorities in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury: Using Discrete Choice Experiments To Determine Preferences. Journal of neurotrauma. 2016;33(21):1958–68. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4423. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pehlivan AU, Sergi F, Erwin A, Yozbatiran N, Francisco GE, O'Malley MK. Design and validation of the RiceWrist-S exoskeleton for robotic rehabilitation after incomplete spinal cord injury. Robotica. 2014;32(8):1415–31. doi: 10.1017/S0263574714001490. - DOI
    1. Vanmulken D, Spooren A, Bongers H, Seelen H. Robot-assisted task-oriented upper extremity skill training in cervical spinal cord injury: a feasibility study. Spinal Cord. 2015;53(7):547. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.250. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kadivar Z, Sullivan J, Eng D, Pehlivan A, O'malley M, Yozbatiran N, et al., editors. Robotic training and kinematic analysis of arm and hand after incomplete spinal cord injury: a case study. Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 2011 IEEE International Conference on; 2011: IEEE. - PubMed