Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2018 Aug;119(3):296-302.
doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0150-6. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

Randomised phase II trial to investigate catumaxomab (anti-EpCAM × anti-CD3) for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with gastric cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomised phase II trial to investigate catumaxomab (anti-EpCAM × anti-CD3) for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with gastric cancer

Maren Knödler et al. Br J Cancer. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) represents an unfavourable prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer (GC). Intraperitoneal treatment with the bispecific and trifunctional antibody catumaxomab (EpCAM, CD3), in addition to systemic chemotherapy, could improve elimination of PC.

Methods: This prospective, randomised, phase II study investigated the efficacy of catumaxomab followed by chemotherapy (arm A, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, docetaxel, FLOT) or FLOT alone (arm B) in patients with GC and PC. Primary endpoint was the rate of macroscopic complete remission (mCR) of PC at the time of second diagnostic laparoscopy/laparotomy prior to optional surgery.

Results: Median follow-up was 52 months. Out of 35 patients screened, 15 were allocated to arm A and 16 to arm B. mCR rate was 27% in arm A and 19% in arm B (p = 0.69). Severe side effects associated with catumaxomab were nausea, infection, abdominal pain, and elevated liver enzymes. Median progression-free (6.7 vs. 5.4 months, p = 0.71) and overall survival (13.2 vs. 13.0 months, p = 0.97) were not significantly different in both treatment arms.

Conclusions: Addition of catumaxomab to systemic chemotherapy was feasible and tolerable in advanced GC. Although the primary endpoint could not be demonstrated, results are promising for future investigations integrating intraperitoneal immunotherapy into a multimodal treatment strategy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

F.L. has received consulting fees from Astellas, BioNTech, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Eli Lilly, Ganymed Pharmaceuticals, Merck Sharp & Dohme; lecture honoraria from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Servier and research support from Fresenius Biotech. V.K. has received research support from Fresenius Biotech. S.I. has received consulting fees from AIO gGmbH. SEAB has an advisory role with Merck, Roche, Celgene, Lilly, and Nordic Pharma; S.I. is a speaker for Merck, Roche, Celgene, Lilly, and Nordic Pharma; and has received research grants from Sanofi, Merck, Roche, Celgene, Vifor, Medac, Hospira, and Lilly. H.L. is the CEO of Trion Research and inventor or coinventor of several trifunctional antibody patents. All other authors declare no competing interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trial profile depicting the total number of patients at screening, inclusion, randomisation, and analysis. FLOT 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel, i.p. intraperitoneal, pts patients. *one patinet did not receive at least one dose of catumaxomab and was switched to the FLOT arm (for safety population only). +one patient died after three doses of catumaxomab and did not receive FLOT treatment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier estimates for progression-free survival in the intention-to treat population. FLOT 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel, Catu Catumaxomab; HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan–Meier estimates for overall survival in the intention-to treat population. FLOT 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel; Catu: Catumaxomab; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval

References

    1. D’Angelica M, et al. Patterns of initial recurrence in completely resected gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. 2004;240:808–816. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000143245.28656.15. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH. Peritoneal-plasma barrier. Cancer Treat. Res. 1996;82:53–63. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-1247-5_4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smyth EC, et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann. Oncol. 2016;27(Suppl. 5):v38–v49. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw350. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sugarbaker PH, Yonemura Y. Clinical pathway for the management of resectable gastric cancer with peritoneal seeding: best palliation with a ray of hope for cure. Oncology. 2000;58:96–107. doi: 10.1159/000012086. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glehen O. Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia for peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from gastric cancer. Arch. Surg. 2004;139:20. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.1.20. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms