The current role and future prospectives of functional parameters by diffusion weighted imaging in the assessment of histologic grade of HCC
- PMID: 29988667
- PMCID: PMC6029348
- DOI: 10.1186/s13027-018-0194-5
The current role and future prospectives of functional parameters by diffusion weighted imaging in the assessment of histologic grade of HCC
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common human solid malignancies worldwide. Although the MRI is the technique that is best adapted to characterize HCC, there is not an agreement regarding the study protocol and even what the role of Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The possibility that imaging study can correlate to histologic grade to selecting the therapeutic strategy would be valuable in helping to direct the proper management of HCC. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and IVIM-derived perfusion fraction (fp) and tissue diffusivity (Dt) values of HCC showed significantly better diagnostic performance in differentiating high-grade HCC from low-grade HCC, and significant correlation was observed between ADC, fp, Dt and histological grade.
Keywords: Diffusion weighted imaging; HCC; Histologic grade; Magnetic resonance imaging.
Conflict of interest statement
Not applicable.Not applicable.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
References
-
- Piccirillo M, Granata V, Albino V, Palaia R, Setola SV, Petrillo A, Tatangelo F, Botti G, Foggia M, Izzo F. Can hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) produce unconventional metastases? Four cases of extrahepatic HCC Tumori. 2013;99(1):e19–e23. - PubMed
-
- NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology on hepatobiliary Cancer Version 2016. http://www.nccn.org.
-
- European Association for Study of Liver; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2012;48(5):599–641. 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.021. Erratum in: Eur J Cancer 2012;48(8):1255–1256. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
