Shelter housing for cats: Principles of design for health, welfare and rehoming
- PMID: 29989500
- PMCID: PMC10816485
- DOI: 10.1177/1098612X18781388
Shelter housing for cats: Principles of design for health, welfare and rehoming
Abstract
Practical relevance: Shelters and rehoming centres are a valuable tool in the population management and rehoming of cats. However, housing large numbers of a relatively asocial species in close proximity poses significant challenges. Well-designed accommodation enables improved standards of husbandry, as well as a better working environment for staff. This can have a significant benefit in expediting rehoming, as cats are healthier, and more likely to display natural behaviors and have positive interactions with potential adopters. Global importance: As cat overpopulation is such a widespread issue, cat shelters are common in many countries. This review will be of interest to those involved in the design and construction of cat shelters, and to those caring for the cats within them. The principles discussed also apply to boarding, breeding, research and hospitalization facilities. Challenges: Shelter housing poses substantial challenges in terms of maintaining positive health and wellbeing while sustaining adoption at an optimum rate. Disease control and biosecurity are typically facilitated by having a relatively barren, easily cleanable environment. However, this must be weighed against the provision of opportunities for cats to perform natural behaviors such as hiding, perching and interacting if they wish. A more enriched environment has also been shown to expedite adoption.
Aims: This review, the first in a two-part series, discusses practical aspects of housing and shelter design for the health, welfare and adoption of shelter cats. Evidence base: There is a relatively small body of empirical evidence to inform shelter design recommendations. The recommendations in this article are based on a careful review of the available evidence, some of which has come from allied fields such as the care of experimental animals. Where evidence is not yet available, recommendations have been based on field experience and collective expert opinion.
Keywords: Animal shelter design; C4C; adoption; capacity for care; cat housing; cattery; shelter medicine; welfare.
Conflict of interest statement
Jenny Stavisky declares no conflict of interest. Kate Hurley and Denae Wagner provide animal shelter facility design consultation services through the Koret Shelter Medicine Program at UC Davis, CA, USA. Denae Wagner provides consultation services to Shor-Line, Kansas City, KS, USA. Some of the information in this article has been presented orally or is adapted from conference presentation proceedings by the authors.
Figures














References
-
- Alberthsen C, Rand JS, Bennett PC, et al. . Cat admissions to RSPCA shelters in Queensland, Australia: description of cats and risk factors for euthanasia after entry. Aust Vet J 2013; 91: 35–42. - PubMed
-
- CFHS. Cats in Canada: a comprehensive report on the cat overpopulation crisis. Canadian Federation of Humane Societies, 2012.
-
- Marsh P. Getting to zero: a roadmap to ending animal shelter overpopulation in the United States. www.shelterover-population.org/Books/Getting_to_Zero.pdf (2012, accessed April 26, 2018).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources