Analysis of Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA in Nasopharyngeal Cancer After Chemoradiation to Identify High-Risk Patients for Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 29989858
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.7847
Analysis of Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA in Nasopharyngeal Cancer After Chemoradiation to Identify High-Risk Patients for Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Purpose The contribution of adjuvant chemotherapy after chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) remains controversial. Plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA is a potential biomarker of subclinical residual disease in NPC. In this prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, we used plasma EBV DNA to identify patients with NPC at a higher risk of relapse for adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Eligible patients with histologically confirmed NPC of Union for International Cancer Control stage IIB to IVB, adequate organ function, and no locoregional disease or distant metastasis were screened by plasma EBV DNA at 6 to 8 weeks after radiotherapy (RT). Patients with undetectable plasma EBV DNA underwent standard surveillance. Patients with detectable plasma EBV DNA were randomly assigned to either adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine for six cycles (arm 1) or observation (arm 2). Patients were stratified for primary treatment (RT v CRT) and stage (II/III v IV). The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS). Results Seven hundred eighty-nine patients underwent EBV DNA screening. Plasma EBV DNA was undetectable in 573 (72.6%) and detectable in 216 (27.4%); 104 (13.2%) with detectable EBV DNA were randomly assigned to arms 1 (n = 52) and 2 (n = 52). After a median follow-up of 6.6 years, no significant difference was found in 5-year RFS rate between arms 1 and 2 (49.3% v 54.7%; P = .75; hazard ratio for relapse or death, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.89). The level of post-RT plasma EBV DNA correlated significantly with the hazards of locoregional failure, distant metastasis, and death. Conclusion In patients with NPC with detectable post-RT plasma EBV DNA, adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine did not improve RFS. Post-RT plasma EBV DNA level should be incorporated as the selection factor in future clinical trials of adjuvant therapy in NPC.
Comment in
-
[Adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine after radiochemotherapy with curative intent does not improve relapse-free survival in nasopharyngeal cancer patients with persistently detectable EBV DNA].Strahlenther Onkol. 2019 Jan;195(1):90-91. doi: 10.1007/s00066-018-1393-0. Strahlenther Onkol. 2019. PMID: 30411241 German. No abstract available.
-
Circulating Tumor DNA to Personalize Treatment in Nasopharynx Cancer - Time to Look "Ahead"?Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jun 1;104(2):362-364. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.02.043. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019. PMID: 31047626 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Integrating postradiotherapy plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA and TNM stage for risk stratification of nasopharyngeal carcinoma to adjuvant therapy.Ann Oncol. 2020 Jun;31(6):769-779. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.03.289. Epub 2020 Mar 23. Ann Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32217076
-
Pretherapy quantitative measurement of circulating Epstein-Barr virus DNA is predictive of posttherapy distant failure in patients with early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma of undifferentiated type.Cancer. 2003 Jul 15;98(2):288-91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11496. Cancer. 2003. PMID: 12872347
-
Plasma Epstein-Barr viral DNA load at midpoint of radiotherapy course predicts outcome in advanced-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Ann Oncol. 2014 Jun;25(6):1204-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu117. Epub 2014 Mar 17. Ann Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24638904
-
Application of circulating plasma/serum EBV DNA in the clinical management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Oral Oncol. 2014 Jun;50(6):527-38. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.12.011. Epub 2014 Jan 15. Oral Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24440146 Review.
-
The emerging data on choice of optimal therapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Curr Opin Oncol. 2020 May;32(3):187-195. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000622. Curr Opin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32175925 Review.
Cited by
-
Optimal sequencing of chemotherapy with chemoradiotherapy based on TNM stage classification and EBV DNA in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Cancer Commun (Lond). 2019 Oct 25;39(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40880-019-0398-0. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2019. PMID: 31653270 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Short-term efficacy and long-term survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with radiographically visible residual disease following observation or additional intervention: A real-world study in China.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022 Nov 16;7(6):1881-1892. doi: 10.1002/lio2.980. eCollection 2022 Dec. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022. PMID: 36544919 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical characteristics and prognostic value of pre-retreatment plasma epstein-barr virus DNA in locoregional recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Cancer Med. 2019 Aug;8(10):4633-4643. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2339. Epub 2019 Jul 3. Cancer Med. 2019. PMID: 31268626 Free PMC article.
-
Induction Chemotherapy Improved Long Term Outcomes in Stage IV Locoregional Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.Int J Med Sci. 2020 Feb 10;17(5):568-576. doi: 10.7150/ijms.42005. eCollection 2020. Int J Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 32210706 Free PMC article.
-
Early Stage and Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treatment from Present to Future: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2023 Jul;24(7):845-866. doi: 10.1007/s11864-023-01083-2. Epub 2023 May 5. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37145382 Free PMC article. Review.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials