Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 10;8(1):10405.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28719-w.

Whole-genome sequencing reveals selection signatures associated with important traits in six goat breeds

Affiliations

Whole-genome sequencing reveals selection signatures associated with important traits in six goat breeds

Jiazhong Guo et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Comparative population genomics analysis is an effective approach to identify selection signatures in farm animals. In this study, we systematically investigated the selection signatures in six phenotypically diverse goat breeds using SNPs obtained from pooled whole-genome resequencing data. More than 95.5% of 446-642 million clean reads were mapped to the latest reference goat genome, which generated a sequencing depth ranging from 22.30 to 31.75-fold for each breed. A total of 5,802,307, 6,794,020, 7,562,312, 5,325,119, 8,764,136, and 9,488,057 putative SNPs were detected in Boer, Meigu, Jintang Black, Nanjiang Yellow, Tibetan, and Tibetan cashmere goats, respectively. Based on the genome-wide FST and expected heterozygosity scores along 100-kb sliding windows, 68, 89, 44, 44, 19, and 35 outlier windows were deemed as the selection signatures in the six goat breeds. After genome annotation, several genes within the selection signals were found to be possibly associated with important traits in goats, such as coat color (IRF4, EXOC2, RALY, EIF2S2, and KITLG), high-altitude adaptation (EPAS1), growth (LDB2), and reproduction traits (KHDRBS2). In summary, we provide an improved understanding of the genetic diversity and the genomic footprints under positive selection or the adaptations to the local environments in the domestic goat genome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of all six domestic goat breeds included in this study. (A) Pools of genomic DNA from the following populations were sequenced: Boer (n = 20; sex = F/M), Meigu (n = 20; sex = F), Jintang Black (n = 20; sex = F/M), Nanjiang Yellow (n = 20; sex = F), Tibetan (n = 20; sex = F/M), and Tibetan cashmere goat (n = 20; sex = M). Photographs were taken by Hongping Zhang and Tianzeng Song. (B) Plot of the first three principal components (PC1, PC2, and PC3) of six goat breeds based on the detected SNPs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Genome-wide histograms of SNPs detected in six goat breeds. The outermost circle represented GC content of the goat reference genome sequence. The circles from outer to inner show the genome-wide distribution of SNPs (counted in 1-Mb non-overlapping windows) in Boer, Meigu, Jintang Black, Nanjiang Yellow, Tibetan, and Tibetan cashmere goats, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Genome-wide distributions of selection signals in the Meigu (A), Nanjiang Yellow (B), and Tibetan cashmere (C) goat. Manhattan plots of ZFST (>0) and absolute values of ZHp (<0) across all autosomes were plotted with different colors. The ZFST and ZHp values were calculated for each sliding 100-kb window with steps of 25 kb across all autosomes. The horizontal dashed line indicates the 99.5 percentile of all the ZFST or ZHp values.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Summary of the overlapped outlier windows detected via ZFST or ZHp scores. (A) A Venn diagram of the outlier windows detected via ZFST or ZHp scores in six goat breeds, based on their genomic positions. Green circles represent the numbers of the outlier windows detected via ZFST values, while the light blue circles represent the windows identified via ZHp scores. (B) A Venn diagram of the overlapped outlier windows across all the six goat breeds, based on their genomic positions. (C) Summary of the biological processes into which the candidate genes can be classified.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Summary of FST and ZHp values of each SNP at the RALY-EIF2S2 and IRF4-EXOC2 loci. (A) The RALY-EIF2S2 locus; (B) the IRF4-EXOC2 locus.

References

    1. Aziz MA. Present status of the world goat populations and their productivity. World. 2010;861:1.
    1. Amills M, Capote J, Tosser-Klopp G. Goat domestication and breeding: a jigsaw of historical, biological and molecular data with missing pieces. Animal Genetics. 2017;48:631–644. doi: 10.1111/age.12598. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen, H., Patterson, N. & Reich, D. Population differentiation as a test for selective sweeps. Genome Res20 (2010). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Narum SR, Hess JE. Comparison of FST outlier tests for SNP loci under selection. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2011;11:184–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.02987.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoban S, et al. Finding the Genomic Basis of Local Adaptation: Pitfalls, Practical Solutions, and Future Directions. The American Naturalist. 2016;188:379–397. doi: 10.1086/688018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types