Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Feb;29(2):898-905.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5607-8. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

Lung cancer screening with MRI: Evaluation of MRI for lung cancer screening by comparison of LDCT- and MRI-derived Lung-RADS categories in the first two screening rounds

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Lung cancer screening with MRI: Evaluation of MRI for lung cancer screening by comparison of LDCT- and MRI-derived Lung-RADS categories in the first two screening rounds

Michael Meier-Schroers et al. Eur Radiol. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate MRI for lung cancer screening comparing LDCT- and MRI-derived Lung-RADS categories in the first two screening rounds.

Materials and methods: 224 participants in a lung cancer screening study were examined with MRI and low-dose CT (LDCT). Acquired MRI sequences were T2, balanced, T1 and DWI. MRI was prospectively analysed regarding nodules. Minimum nodule size was 4 mm. Nodules were assigned a Lung-RADS score based on appearance and size at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months. MRI findings were correlated with LDCT.

Results: The early recall rate dropped from 13.8% at baseline to 1.9% in the second screening round with biopsy rates of 3.6% in the first round and 0.5% in the second round. Histology revealed lung cancer in 8/9 participants undergoing biopsy/surgery. All eight cancers were accurately depicted by MRI. The following categories were assigned on MRI (results of LDCT in parentheses): 4B/4X in 10 (10) cases, 4A in 16 (15) cases, 3 in 13 (12) cases, 2 in 77 (92) cases and 1 in 140 (126) cases. Lung-RADS scoring correlated significantly between MRI and CT. The score was overestimated by MRI in one case for category 4A, in two cases for category 3 and in five cases for category 2. MRI-based Lung-RADS score was underestimated for category 1 in 20 cases.

Conclusion: Lung-RADS might be applied for lung cancer screening with MRI, since findings correlated with LDCT. Relevant findings with a Lung-RADS score of 3 and higher were never missed or underestimated by MRI KEY POINTS: • MRI performed comparably to low-dose CT in a lung cancer-screening programme. • Lung-RADS might be applied for lung cancer screening with MRI. • Lung-RADS findings score of 3 and higher were never missed by MRI.

Keywords: Early detection of cancer; Lung; Lung neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multidetector computed tomography.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jan;208(1):208-213 - PubMed
    1. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(4):344-53 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Feb;13(2 Suppl):R25-9 - PubMed
    1. Insights Imaging. 2012 Aug;3(4):345-53 - PubMed
    1. J Thorac Imaging. 2013 May;28(3):138-50 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources