Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug;7(8):3673-3681.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.1662. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population-based retrospective study

Qi Liu  1   2 , Dakui Luo  1   2 , Sanjun Cai  1   2 , Qingguo Li  1   2 , Xinxiang Li  1   2
Affiliations

Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population-based retrospective study

Qi Liu et al. Cancer Med. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to investigate circumferential resection margin (CRM) as a prognostic factor for long-term oncologic survival after rectal cancer surgery.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with malignant rectal cancer between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2014, from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program were identified for this study. The patients were divided into five CRM groups to compare the baseline characteristics and assess cancer-specific survival (CSS): 0-1 mm, 1.1-2.0 mm, 2.1-5.0 mm, 5.1-10.0 mm, and >10 mm. The main endpoint was CSS.

Results: Circumferential resection margin ≤1 mm was independently associated with 99% increased risk of cancer-specific mortality in rectal cancer [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.990, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.613-2.454, P < 0.001, using CRM (1.1-2.0 mm) as a reference]. CRM (5.1-10.0 mm) was independently associated with 29.2% decreased risk of cancer-specific mortality [HR = 0.708, 95% CI = 0.525-0.954, P = 0.152, using group (2.1-5.0 mm) as reference]. CRM ≤2 mm or ≤0.4 mm was not obviously associated with CSS.

Conclusions: circumferential resection margin is an independent prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Surgeons should try to maximize the CRM. Rectal cancer patients with CRM ≤1 mm should receive more postoperative attention depending on individual situation. Also, CRM should be accurately measured in millimeters in a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or pathological report, rather than simply described as "involved" or "clear."

Keywords: SEER; circumferential resection margin; prognostic; rectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of patient population selection from the SEER database
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan‐Meier cancer‐specific survival curve according to circumferential resection margin (CRM)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan‐Meier overall survival curve according to circumferential resection margin (CRM)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kelly SB, Mills SJ, Bradburn DM, et al. Effect of the circumferential resection margin on survival following rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98(4):573‐581. - PubMed
    1. Fokas E, Ströbel P, Fietkau R, et al. Tumor regression grading after preoperative chemoradiotherapy as a prognostic factor and individual‐level surrogate for disease‐free survival in rectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109(12): 10.1093/jnci/djx095 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ikoma N, You YN, Bednarski BK, et al. Impact of recurrence and salvage surgery on survival after multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(23):JCO2016721464. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Engelen SM, Maas M, Lahaye MJ, et al. Modern multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer based on staging with magnetic resonance imaging leads to excellent local control, but distant control remains a challenge. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(10):2311‐2320. - PubMed
    1. Nikberg M, Kindler C, Chabok A, et al. Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic marker in the modern multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(3):275. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources